Skip to main content

Security report for paris-tours.fr

Transportation · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.paris-tours.fr serves as the official digital platform for the Paris Tours cycling race, providing comprehensive information about the event, including news, team details, live coverage, and media contacts. It targets cycling enthusiasts, sports fans, and media professionals, positioning itself as a key source for race-related content. The site leverages modern web technologies and tracking tools to deliver a rich user experience and advertising capabilities. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and explicit privacy and terms of service policies slightly detracts from its overall trustworthiness. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates social media channels effectively, enhancing its outreach and engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paris-tours.fr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paris Tours operates within the transportation and sports event sector, focusing on cycling race promotion and information dissemination. The business model revolves around event marketing, media partnerships, and merchandise sales (evidenced by the store link). The website's integration with official bodies like UCI and presence on major social platforms indicate strong market positioning. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, advertising via Google DFP, and merchandise sales. The target audience includes cycling fans, sports media, and sponsors. The site demonstrates a professional digital presence but lacks publicly visible detailed corporate information or contact channels, which could be improved for enhanced credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, uses cookie consent banners, and integrates reputable tracking and advertising technologies. However, it lacks visible advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical security controls to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen technical security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contact information.
  4. Improve transparency by providing clear business contact details and corporate information.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure privacy compliance and minimize risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
All informations of Paris Tours cycling race
Key services
race information, news updates, team details, live coverage, media contacts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google DFP (DoubleClick for Publishers), Facebook SDK, TikTok Pixel, Dailymotion video embedding, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent banner for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
TikTok Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DFP
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official for Paris Tours cycling race 2025 edition.
  2. Content is rich with news, race info, teams, and media resources.
  3. Strong use of modern tracking and advertising technologies.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a legitimate domain.
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links detected in provided content.
  8. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Twitter, Instagram links.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and embeds videos from Dailymotion.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with libraries such as Slick Slider for UI, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and integrates multiple tracking pixels (TikTok, Facebook). Video content is embedded via Dailymotion. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images. Performance is moderate, with some heavy scripts for advertising and tracking. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paris-tours.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paris-tours.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.