Skip to main content

Security report for paratype.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paratype.com is a professional website offering high-quality fonts and typography tools aimed at designers, developers, and digital content creators. The site features a catalog of fonts, a Fontoscope™ tool, special offers, and a typetester, indicating an e-commerce business model focused on digital product sales. The website uses modern Angular framework technology with integration of Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. The design is professional and mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy or recent registration status. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paratype.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paratype.com operates in the technology sector, specifically digital typography and font sales. The business model is e-commerce focused on selling fonts and related digital tools. The target audience includes designers and digital content creators. The site leverages modern web technologies and standard marketing analytics tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Lack of WHOIS data and absence of contact or compliance information may impact perceived credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with consistent branding and good content quality. Growth potential exists if compliance and trust indicators are enhanced.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected. No forms are present to evaluate input security. There is no published privacy policy, cookie policy, or incident response information, which are critical for GDPR and general data protection compliance. Tracking technologies from Facebook and Google are present, indicating moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces trust and raises potential legitimacy concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security transparency.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet broader compliance and usability standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
High-quality, professional fonts for digital content, web, printing, ads, video, apps and games.
Key services
font catalog, Fontoscope™ tool, special offers, typetester
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.13, PrimeNG UI components, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by og:url https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected to analyze for secure inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS server returned no data
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in HTML content
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  5. Uses modern Angular framework and standard marketing analytics tools
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies
  7. No forms detected on main page to analyze data collection
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Tracking pixels from Facebook and Google present
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 18.2.13 with PrimeNG UI components, indicating a modern and maintainable front-end technology stack. It uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, integrated via Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and compliance documents suggests areas for technical improvement to reduce risk and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paratype.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paratype.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.