Skip to main content

Security report for paralympic.ee

Eesti Paralümpiakomitee · Non-profit · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Paralümpiakomitee is the official Estonian Paralympic Committee, a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting Paralympic athletes and promoting Paralympic sports within Estonia. The website serves as a hub for news, event calendars, athlete information, and organizational details, targeting athletes, supporters, and the general public interested in Paralympic sports. The organization maintains a clear national presence with sponsorships and social media engagement. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Axios, and sliders for dynamic content presentation. It uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility, with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and CSRF token usage in forms, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security or incident response policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trust and user engagement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paralympic.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Estonian Paralympic Committee operates as a small non-profit entity focused on Paralympic sports development and athlete support in Estonia. Its market position is national and specialized, with key services including event organization, athlete promotion, and public engagement. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships and government or cultural funding, as indicated by sponsor logos and cultural ministry links. The organization targets disabled athletes and sports enthusiasts, leveraging partnerships with local and international sponsors. The website reflects a stable digital presence with active social media channels, supporting community building and outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms. The use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with policy disclosures and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eesti Paralümpiakomitee
Registration number
80097278
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Paralümpiakomitee
Description
Eesti Paralümpiakomitee is the Estonian Paralympic Committee, a non-profit organization supporting Paralympic sports and athletes in Estonia. It organizes events, supports athletes, and promotes Paralympic sports.
Key services
Organizing Paralympic sports events, Supporting athletes, Promoting Paralympic sports, Publishing news and event calendars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Axios, Google Fonts, ResponsiveSlides, Slick Slider, Modernizr, Bootstrap modal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google tag (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Google tag manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and via newsletter form
  4. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google services
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available
  8. Business is a non-profit national Paralympic committee with clear sponsorships
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Axios, Google reCAPTCHA, and slider libraries to deliver dynamic content. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The HTML is valid and structured with responsive design elements, supporting good mobile usability. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Hosting details are not explicit from the HTML. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data, which could be enhanced for better search visibility. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with modern frameworks and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paralympic.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paralympic.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.