Skip to main content

Security report for parakeeto.com

Parakeeto · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parakeeto is a specialized consultancy focused on improving the profitability of digital and creative marketing agencies. Established in 2015, the company offers profitability measurement and audit services designed to help agencies optimize their financial performance. The website positions Parakeeto as a niche expert with a clear target audience of digital marketing and creative agencies seeking profitability insights. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and Cloudflare DNS, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parakeeto.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parakeeto operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting digital marketing and creative agencies. Its business model revolves around providing consulting and audit services to improve agency profitability. The company leverages a strong online presence with active social media channels on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, enhancing its market visibility. The domain age and registration details align well with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The use of advanced marketing tools suggests a focus on lead generation and customer engagement. However, the absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the website may limit trust for some visitors. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. The use of Cloudflare DNS adds resilience against DNS attacks, but the lack of DNSSEC is a notable gap. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parakeeto
Description
Parakeeto specializes in measuring and improving your digital marketing agency's profitability. Get a full audit in as little as 2 weeks.
Key services
profitability measurement, digital marketing agency audits, profit improvement consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
SearchAtlas
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional service provider specializing in digital marketing agency profitability.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or metadata.
  3. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts indicating active user tracking.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  6. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides flexibility and a professional design. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS, enhancing availability and security. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected. The site would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance improvements to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parakeeto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parakeeto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.