Skip to main content

Security report for panopro.cz

PanoPro s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PanoPro s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in professional 3D laser scanning, virtual tours, interactive maps, and 3D modeling services. The company targets businesses and professionals requiring advanced spatial visualization solutions across the Czech Republic. Their website reflects a professional service provider with a clear focus on real estate and related industries, offering both 3D and 2D deliverables. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates common plugins for SEO, analytics, and form handling, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks published privacy, cookie, and security policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and professional, but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching panopro.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention panopro.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for panopro.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and spatial visualization sector, providing specialized 3D scanning and virtual tour services. Their market position appears as a niche service provider with nationwide coverage in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering high-value digital assets to clients. The website content and metadata suggest a focus on professional clients rather than consumers. The absence of detailed contact information and policies may limit trust and conversion potential. The technology stack is modern and standard for small to medium enterprises, with integrations for analytics and marketing. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site does not publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be improved with formal policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve technical security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to formalize security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PanoPro s.r.o.
Description
Profesionální 3D laserové skenování, virtuální prohlídky, interaktivní mapy a 3D modely + 2D výkresy. Pomůžeme vám ukázat, co za to stojí. Působíme po celé ČR.
Key services
3D laser scanning, Virtual tours, Interactive maps, 3D models, 2D drawings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO, Swiper.js, Tippy.js, Contact Form 7, Monarch, Ajax Search Lite, Divi Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Monarch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Website uses modern WordPress theme (Divi) and common plugins for SEO, forms, and analytics.
  5. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks published security policies.
  6. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is professional and business-focused.
  7. External links mostly to Google services and fonts; no suspicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging popular plugins for SEO (Yoast), analytics (Google Analytics and Tag Manager), and form handling (Contact Form 7). The site loads Google Fonts and uses JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Tippy.js for UI enhancements. Hosting is provided by WebSupport, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with standard optimization practices. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. There is no indication of technical debt or legacy technologies, but security headers and formal policies are missing, representing modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with panopro.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review panopro.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.