Skip to main content

Security report for palmerscars.co.uk

Palmers Motor Company · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Palmers Motor Company is a well-established automotive dealership operating in the UK with over 25 years of experience. They offer a wide range of new and used vehicles from multiple manufacturers, along with servicing, parts, finance, and online buying options. The website reflects a professional and customer-focused business with multiple interactive features including enquiry forms and social media integration. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Alpine.js, Livewire, and Swiper.js, hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure with CDN support, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clear privacy policy page. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or incorrectly queried, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching palmerscars.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Palmers Motor Company holds a strong regional market position in the automotive retail sector, representing 11 vehicle brands and serving customers primarily in Hemel Hempstead and Watford. Their business model combines vehicle sales with aftersales services and financing, targeting a broad customer base from individual buyers to business clients. The company leverages digital tools for customer engagement including online enquiry forms and social media channels. The presence of manufacturer-trained staff and customer reviews enhances credibility. However, the absence of detailed corporate registration data and privacy policies online suggests areas for improvement in corporate transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder effective vulnerability reporting and incident handling. Embedded third-party forms and scripts should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a retail website but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or header.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security policy or vulnerability disclosure page with contact information for incident reporting.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and embedded forms for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
03437233
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Palmers Motor Company
Description
Palmers Motor Company is a privately-owned car dealership operating from two locations in Watford and Hemel Hempstead with over 25 years of experience. They represent 11 vehicle manufacturers and offer new and used cars, servicing, MOT, accident repairs, and vehicle safety checks.
Key services
New vehicle sales, Used vehicle sales, Vehicle servicing and MOT, Parts supply, Finance and insurance, Online vehicle buying, Accident repairs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Livewire (Laravel), Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Elfsight widgets, DigitalOcean Spaces CDN, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Laravel Livewire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token meta tag present
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elfsight widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Multiple embedded enquiry forms use iframes from autoweb-studio.co.uk
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube is linked
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in main navigation or footer
  5. Cookie consent script is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or incorrectly queried for subdomain rather than base domain
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
  8. Website uses modern frontend technologies and CDN hosting
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend frameworks including Alpine.js and Laravel Livewire, providing dynamic and reactive user interfaces. It uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is supported by DigitalOcean with CDN delivery via DigitalOcean Spaces, ensuring good performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Some technical debt is noted in missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization in loading third-party scripts and iframe-based forms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with palmerscars.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review palmerscars.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.