Skip to main content

Security report for p3cevents.com

Access Intelligence, LLC. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P3C Media operates as a specialized event and media company focused on public-private partnerships, primarily serving the transportation, government, education, and healthcare sectors. The company organizes multiple project delivery events and maintains a strong online presence to engage a large public sector audience. Their market position is solid, supported by a medium-sized organizational structure under the parent company Access Intelligence, LLC. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business objectives and target audience engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and accessibility tools including Google Analytics, New Relic, Osano consent management, and UserWay accessibility widget. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and performance metrics, although some hosting details remain undisclosed. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or security policy pages. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of WHOIS registration data reduces trustworthiness. The site uses multiple third-party scripts which should be regularly audited to maintain security. Overall, the website presents a low risk with a good security posture and privacy compliance, but improvements in transparency around domain registration, security policies, and contact information would enhance trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p3cevents.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

P3C Media is positioned as a key player in the public-private partnership event space, leveraging a business model centered on conferences, expos, and digital engagement to connect public sector professionals with industry partners. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad portfolio of specialized events across multiple infrastructure sectors and a substantial subscriber base. Revenue streams likely include event sponsorships, exhibitor fees, and digital advertising. The company targets government officials, developers, financiers, and consultants, fostering a strong partnership ecosystem. Strategic observations indicate a focus on growth through diversified event offerings and digital content delivery, supported by a reputable parent company.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and WHOIS transparency are notable gaps. No immediate vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were observed in the content or scripts. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy policy and consent mechanisms. The security culture appears to prioritize user privacy and accessibility but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation to improve incident readiness and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or dedicated page.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Disclose verified contact information including security and abuse email addresses to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider registering WHOIS information publicly or using a reputable privacy service with clear justification to improve domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Description
P3C Represents a Community Where Owners and Industry Meet. They connect public sector audiences through project delivery events and online engagement.
Key services
Project delivery events, Conferences, Online engagement and digital offerings, Networking opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, New Relic Browser monitoring, Osano Consent Management, UserWay Accessibility Widget, Intercom Chat Widget, Omeda Olytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Accessibility compliance tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser, Omeda Olytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Omeda Olytics, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on public-private partnership events across multiple sectors.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trust score.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn.
  9. Accessibility features implemented via UserWay widget.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates advanced monitoring and analytics tools including New Relic Browser, Google Analytics, and Omeda Olytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Accessibility is addressed via the UserWay widget, and consent management is handled by Osano. Performance is moderate with optimized images and video content. The site uses multiple CDN and font services to improve load times. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p3cevents.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p3cevents.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.