Skip to main content

Security report for p1.nl

P1 · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P1 is a leading Dutch parking service provider specializing in both offstreet and onstreet parking management. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including parking control, management, centralized monitoring, and digital customer services. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation, customer testimonials, and detailed service descriptions targeting Dutch parking customers and municipalities. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for privacy-compliant analytics and consent management, and is served over HTTPS ensuring secure communications. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policy disclosures. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p1.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

P1 holds a strong market position as the number one parking service provider in the Netherlands, serving both public and private sectors. Their business model revolves around parking management services, digital permit handling, and customer-centric solutions. The company targets municipalities and individual parkers, leveraging partnerships and digital tools to enhance service delivery. The presence of a dedicated contact subdomain and active social media channels indicates a well-established customer engagement strategy. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests potential areas for strategic enhancement to boost trust and compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and privacy-conscious analytics implementation. The use of Usercentrics for consent management aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Enhancing security policies and publishing incident response contacts would strengthen the security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
P1
Description
P1 is de nummer één parkeerdienstverlener van Nederland die offstreet en onstreet parkeeractiviteiten combineert en beheert.
Key services
Parkeercontrole, Parkeerbeheer, Centrale meldkamer parkeren, Landelijke storingsdienst parkeren, Financieel en administratief parkeerbeheer, Commercie en marketing parkeerlocaties, Digitaal loket
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Fuse.js, JavaScript-autoComplete, Luminous Lightbox, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Google Tag Manager with consent defaults to denied
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management, Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  3. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  4. Good integration of analytics and marketing tools with privacy controls.
  5. Clear business contact information and physical address provided.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Use of multiple modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  8. No CMS or hosting provider explicitly identified.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse JavaScript technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Fuse.js, and Usercentrics for consent management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags with consent defaults set to denied, reflecting privacy-aware implementation. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified, which may indicate a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. The absence of security headers and limited accessibility features are notable technical gaps.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p1.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p1.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.