Skip to main content

Security report for otisk.org

Otisk o.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Otisk o.s. is a small Czech non-profit civic association focused on organizing cultural and community events around the Areál Bolfánek and Lesní komplex Žďár areas. Their website provides information about upcoming events, guided tours, and visitor services, targeting local community members and tourists interested in cultural heritage and nature. The site uses a modest technology stack including jQuery, Galleria, and bxSlider, but lacks modern security and privacy features. The absence of HTTPS information and outdated JavaScript libraries pose potential security risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and Google Analytics is used without visible consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching otisk.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention otisk.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for otisk.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Otisk operates as a local cultural non-profit with a focus on community engagement through events and tours. Their business model relies on organizing and promoting cultural activities rather than commercial sales. The website supports their mission by providing event details and contact information. The association maintains a Facebook presence to engage with their audience. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information is typical for small non-profits. Growth opportunities may include enhanced digital presence and improved privacy compliance to build trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no visible critical vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and absence of security headers or HTTPS confirmation are concerns. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The WHOIS data unavailability further reduces trust. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring urgent updates to libraries, implementation of HTTPS, and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Include security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Otisk o.s.
Description
Otisk is a civic association (občanské sdružení) focused on cultural and community activities around the Areál Bolfánek and Lesní komplex Žďár areas near Chudenice, Czech Republic. They organize events such as ceramic and craft markets, guided tours, and operatic performances.
Key services
Event organization, Guided tours, Cultural performances, Visitor information, Accommodation and hospitality services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.1, Galleria 1.2.9, bxSlider, Highslide JS, Google Fonts, Seznam Mapy API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small non-profit cultural association site in Czech language.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to email in footer; no phone or physical address found.
  4. Uses outdated jQuery version (1.7.1) which may pose security risks.
  5. No HTTPS or security headers information available from provided data.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable or blocked, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery 1.7.1, Galleria 1.2.9, and bxSlider, which may have known vulnerabilities. The site loads external resources from Facebook, Google Fonts, and Seznam Mapy API. The HTML structure is basic but functional with some inline scripts for modals and galleries. No modern CMS or frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile or accessibility beyond basic levels. SEO meta tags are present but minimal. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, which is a critical technical gap.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with otisk.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review otisk.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.