Skip to main content

Security report for oredo.cz

OREDO s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OREDO s.r.o. is a regional public transport integrator owned by the Hradec Králové and Pardubice regions in the Czech Republic. The company manages the integrated tariff system IREDO, which allows passengers to travel across buses and trains in these regions using a single ticket. The website provides basic information about the company, contact details, and links to the IREDO tariff system. The business model focuses on public transport organization and tariff integration within a defined geographic area, targeting local residents and travelers. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.16 and jQuery UI, indicating some technical debt and potential modernization needs. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and does not show evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance appears moderate, with basic mobile optimization and limited interactive elements. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure communications. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap given GDPR requirements in the EU. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, although the website content and contact information align with a legitimate regional public transport entity. No forms or incident response contacts were found, limiting the ability to report security issues. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in security posture, privacy compliance, and technical modernization. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with HSTS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, updating technical libraries, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oredo.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OREDO operates as a government-owned regional transport integrator, providing a unified tariff system (IREDO) for public transport in two Czech regions. Its competitive advantage lies in regional government backing and exclusive control over integrated transport tariffs. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on transport coordination rather than direct transport operations. Revenue streams likely come from regional government funding and transport service contracts. The target customers are local commuters and travelers within the Hradec Králové and Pardubice regions. Growth indicators are not visible on the website, and no partnerships beyond the regional governments and the IREDO tariff system are explicitly mentioned. The company appears stable but small in scale, with limited digital presence and marketing efforts.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies, which expose users to potential data interception and privacy risks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, limiting the organization's ability to respond to security incidents effectively. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce known vulnerabilities. Compliance gaps with GDPR are evident due to missing privacy documentation and consent mechanisms. The security culture appears minimal based on public-facing information, suggesting a need for enhanced security awareness and governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all website traffic and protect user data.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries and frameworks to supported, secure versions.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OREDO s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OREDO s.r.o.
Description
OREDO is a company founded and owned by the Hradec Králové and Pardubice regions to organize the operation of public transport. It manages the integrated regional transport tariff system IREDO allowing travel on one ticket across buses and trains in these regions.
Key services
Public transport organization, Integrated tariff system (IREDO)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.16, jQuery UI, jQuery Fancybox, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is publicly accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses older JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.8.16) indicating potential technical debt.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found despite GDPR relevance.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  6. No social media links or analytics scripts detected.
  7. Website content is focused on regional public transport integration and tariff information.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details available from provided data.
  9. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on legacy JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.8.16) and lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating technical debt. The site uses multiple JavaScript files for UI and calendar functions but does not employ modern SPA frameworks or responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization and modernization. SEO is weak due to missing meta keywords and descriptions placeholders. Accessibility features are minimal, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data, limiting full technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oredo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oredo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.