Skip to main content

Security report for orderman.com

Orderman GmbH · Retail · Austria

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

30/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Orderman GmbH is a well-established company specializing in professional hardware and services tailored for the hospitality and retail sectors. With over 30 years of experience and a strong market position as a leader in mobile cash registers, Orderman offers a broad portfolio including handheld devices, POS systems, printers, panel PCs, kiosks, and call systems. The company operates primarily in Austria and Italy, with additional presence in Dubai, and is a subsidiary of NCR, enhancing its credibility and market reach. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Elementor and JetEngine, supported by Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics with consent mode enabled, demonstrating a good level of digital maturity and privacy awareness. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO practices and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes standard security headers. It employs cookie consent mechanisms and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. These gaps represent opportunities for improving transparency and security posture. Overall, Orderman GmbH's website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting its business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security policy communication and incident response readiness would further strengthen its risk management and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching orderman.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
30

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Orderman GmbH holds a strong market position as a leader in mobile cash registers, serving hospitality and retail sectors with a comprehensive hardware and service portfolio. Its business model focuses on providing durable, professional-grade digitization solutions, backed by warranty programs like Care & Care Gold. The company benefits from its parent NCR's experience and resources, enabling a broad customer base exceeding 80,000 clients worldwide. The presence of partner and RMA portals indicates a mature partner ecosystem and after-sales support infrastructure. Marketing efforts leverage social media and newsletters, targeting business customers seeking reliable digitization tools. The website content and structure reflect a focus on quality, innovation, and customer service, supporting sustained growth and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and excellent SSL configuration. Standard security headers are present, and cookie consent is managed via Borlabs Cookie with integration to Google Tag Manager's consent mode, ensuring compliance with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness communication. The site would benefit from adding these elements to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Orderman GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Orderman GmbH
Description
We offer a comprehensive range of professional hardware and services for gastronomy and retail
Key services
Handheld devices, POS systems, Printers, Panel PCs, Kiosks, Call systems, Warranty and service products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetEngine, Borlabs Cookie, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Elementor, JetEngine
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on hospitality and retail sectors
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy compliance with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies
  5. Clear contact information with multiple physical locations
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  7. No visible security policy or incident response page
  8. Good SEO and social media integration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and JetEngine frameworks, which provide flexible and responsive design capabilities. The use of Borlabs Cookie ensures GDPR-compliant cookie management with consent mechanisms integrated into analytics and advertising scripts. Performance is moderate, with standard optimization practices applied. The site includes multiple external integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YouTube embeds, and Mailchimp for marketing automation. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of plugin updates and security patches is recommended to maintain stability and security. Hosting details are not explicit, but no performance or availability issues were observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with orderman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review orderman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.