Skip to main content

Security report for openscop.icu

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website openscop.icu hosts a Matomo analytics platform instance, primarily serving as a login portal for authorized users to access analytics data. The platform is an open-source, free/libre analytics solution, targeting website administrators and analytics professionals who require privacy-focused visitor tracking. The business model revolves around providing analytics services with a focus on data privacy and user control. The site is relatively new, with domain registration dating back to 2019, and is hosted by Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The content is minimal, focusing on authentication, with no public-facing business or contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching openscop.icu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself within the technology sector, specifically in web analytics. It leverages the Matomo platform, which is known for privacy compliance and open-source transparency. The lack of public business information or contact details suggests a small or private operation, possibly serving internal or limited external clients. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The business model likely depends on software deployment and possibly consulting or hosting services related to Matomo analytics. The absence of marketing or advertising elements indicates a focus on functionality over commercial promotion.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. The login form includes security features such as password confirmation and disabled submit button until form completion, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no DNSSEC is enabled for the domain, and no explicit security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The absence of public security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies on the website to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information, including security incident response contacts, to enhance transparency and facilitate communication.
  5. Consider integrating multi-factor authentication and CAPTCHA on the login page to strengthen access control.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
Web analytics, Visitor tracking, Data privacy management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
Matomo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client side DoNotTrack detection enabled
  • Password confirmation required for sensitive actions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Matomo analytics platform instance
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page
  3. No contact information or security policies publicly disclosed
  4. Site uses HTTPS and is hosted by Gandi SAS
  5. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  6. Site content is minimal and focused on user authentication
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected
  8. Matomo analytics scripts and configurations are present
  9. No social media or external contact links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on the Matomo analytics platform, utilizing PHP and JavaScript technologies. It is hosted by Gandi SAS, a reputable provider. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. The technical implementation is standard for a Matomo instance, with JavaScript tracking code and fallback image tracking. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of JavaScript assets. The site is minimally optimized for mobile and accessibility, with basic responsive design. SEO optimization is minimal due to the nature of the login page and lack of public content. There is no CMS detected beyond the Matomo platform itself.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with openscop.icu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review openscop.icu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.