Skip to main content

Security report for opdyke.com

H.J. Opdyke Lumber Company · Retail · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

H.J. Opdyke Lumber Company is a well-established regional supplier of lumber and building materials, servicing residential and multifamily properties since 1955. The company offers a broad range of products and design services including kitchens, baths, decking, doors, windows, and closets, targeting contractors, builders, and homeowners primarily in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. Their market position is solid with multiple physical locations and a medium-sized business footprint. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and accessibility features, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security shortfall. The site uses Sucuri Cloudproxy for WAF protection, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and hCaptcha for form security. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no terms of service or security policies are found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching opdyke.com

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors of building materials, with a business model focused on both retail and wholesale supply. Their revenue streams likely include product sales, design services, and credit account management. The target customers are residential and commercial builders and property owners in the tri-state area. The company leverages partnerships such as the Epicor Anywhere portal for contractors, indicating integration with ERP or business management systems. The website content and structure support a customer-centric approach with clear navigation, credit application forms, and multiple contact channels. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product catalog and multiple locations. The company maintains a consistent brand image and trust signals such as longevity and policy transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with the presence of security headers and bot protection via hCaptcha. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS severely undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, but the lack of modern TLS protocols and HSTS implementation are significant gaps. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of Sucuri Cloudproxy WAF is a positive security control. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing SSL/TLS and could expose the business to reputational and operational risks.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure all third-party scripts are up to date.
  6. Enhance transparency by adding vulnerability disclosure and data protection officer contact information.
  7. Improve website performance metrics and monitor for broken links or errors.
  8. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving compliance requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
H.J. Opdyke Lumber Company
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform version 6.8.1, utilizing plugins such as Smart Slider 3, Autoptimize, and Sogo Accessibility to enhance user experience and accessibility. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes, and uses hCaptcha for form spam protection. Hosting is provided via Sucuri Cloudproxy, which offers WAF protection. Despite these modern technologies, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS protocols, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance data is unavailable, but caching and CDN usage suggest moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, but technical debt exists in the security configuration. Opportunities exist to modernize SSL/TLS, improve performance monitoring, and enhance security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with opdyke.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review opdyke.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.