Skip to main content

Security report for oogvereniging.nl

Oogvereniging · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oogvereniging is a Dutch non-profit organization dedicated to supporting individuals with eye diseases by providing information, community connections, and advocacy. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for members and the public, offering news, events, and membership benefits. The organization maintains a strong market position within the Netherlands as a trusted entity in eye health support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Gravity Forms and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. It employs a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, ensuring user privacy and transparency. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and Cloudflare Bot Management, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and trustworthy, with clear contact channels and active social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oogvereniging.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oogvereniging.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oogvereniging.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a medium-sized non-profit focused on eye health and patient support in the Netherlands. Its business model revolves around membership services, events, publications, and donations. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting engagement and growth. Partnerships with major social media platforms and advertising networks like Microsoft Advertising and TikTok indicate active outreach. The absence of detailed security policies and vulnerability disclosures suggests room for maturity in security governance. The organization’s transparent contact information and consistent branding reinforce credibility and trust within its community.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cloudflare Bot Management cookies. Cookie consent is granular and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers appear partially implemented but could be explicitly confirmed and enhanced. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could benefit from formalized policies and public disclosures to improve trust and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers explicitly (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen defense-in-depth.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Oogvereniging
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oogvereniging
Description
De Oogvereniging staat voor de belangen van mensen met een oogziekte en brengt hen met elkaar in contact.
Key services
Information and support for people with eye diseases, Organizing events and webinars, Publishing a magazine, Connecting members through local groups and cafés
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising, TikTok, Twitter, Bing
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Gravity Forms, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and user control
  3. Multiple social media channels actively linked
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. Clear and accessible contact information including phone, email, and physical address
  6. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and plugins like Gravity Forms for form management. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, alongside Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analysis. CookieYes manages cookie consent with detailed categories and user controls. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features including a read-aloud function. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare services for performance and security. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is mature and well-integrated, supporting a professional user experience and compliance with privacy regulations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oogvereniging.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oogvereniging.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.