Skip to main content

Security report for onstehuisbrabant.be

Ons Tehuis Brabant · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ons Tehuis Brabant is a Belgian non-profit organization dedicated to providing care and support services for adults with mental disabilities. Accredited by the Vlaams Agentschap voor Personen met een Handicap (VAPH), the organization operates multiple facilities offering day support, residential assistance, and personalized care budgets. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and social media engagement, positioning them as a trusted regional care provider. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Axios, alongside jQuery, and is built on the Webhero CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response documentation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating a solid baseline for privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of WHOIS data is due to registry restrictions rather than suspicious activity, and the domain's legitimacy is supported by consistent business information and accreditations. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a strong focus on user privacy and accessibility. Strategic enhancements in security headers and incident response transparency would further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onstehuisbrabant.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ons Tehuis Brabant occupies a niche in the non-profit healthcare sector, focusing on adults with intellectual disabilities in Belgium. Their market positioning is strengthened by official accreditation and membership in relevant care networks. The organization’s business model centers on providing subsidized care services funded through government agencies and donations, supported by an active volunteer program and fundraising platform. Their target audience includes clients, families, and donors. The website’s integration with social media and a dedicated donation platform indicates a mature digital presence supporting growth and community engagement. Partnerships with VAPH and tRede enhance credibility and operational collaboration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and GDPR compliance is evident through privacy policies and consent forms. The presence of secure contact forms with explicit GDPR consent checkboxes indicates attention to data protection. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for hardening. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could limit transparency and responsiveness to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a strong security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ons Tehuis Brabant
VAT number
BE 0413.336.103
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ons Tehuis Brabant
Description
Onze vzw is vergund door het Vlaams Agentschap voor Personen met een Handicap (VAPH). Wij zetten ons in voor de zorg en de begeleiding van volwassenen met een handicap. De organisatie biedt vraaggestuurde zorg, woon- en dagbegeleiding en individueel aanbod voor volwassenen met een verstandelijke handicap. Ze hebben drie vestigingen in Kampenhout en omgeving met professionele begeleiding en een focus op levenskwaliteit.
Key services
Dagondersteuning, Woonondersteuning, Zorg aanvragen, Persoonsvolgend budget
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Vue.js, Axios, ES6 Promise polyfill
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • GDPR consent on contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong focus on care for adults with mental disabilities.
  3. Multiple contact channels and social media presence.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented.
  5. No visible security headers detected; room for improvement.
  6. WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy, common for .be domains.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with Vue.js and Axios for dynamic content and form handling, supported by jQuery for legacy compatibility. It uses the Webhero CMS platform, which provides templating and API integration capabilities. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses external hosting for images and videos, and integrates social media and donation platforms. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by improving security headers and monitoring third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onstehuisbrabant.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onstehuisbrabant.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.