Skip to main content

Security report for onlinefundraising.dk

OnlineFundraising · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OnlineFundraising is a Danish company specializing in providing comprehensive fundraising payment solutions tailored for non-profit organizations. Their platform supports multiple payment methods including MobilePay, SMS, and payment cards, and integrates with CRM systems and telemarketing services. The company has a strong market presence with over 200 organizations using their services and has been recognized with the Gazelle 2024 award, indicating growth and business success. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, with modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response details suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience, with no signs of malicious content or blocking mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onlinefundraising.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on enabling organizations to efficiently manage donations and recurring payments. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering a platform that simplifies payment processing and fundraising activities. Testimonials from reputable organizations and partnerships with CRM integrators like itm8 enhance their competitive advantage. The presence of a dedicated support subdomain and extensive documentation indicates a customer-centric approach. The company targets fundraising teams and non-profit organizations primarily in Denmark, with multilingual support for English. Growth indicators include the Gazelle award and a broad client base. Strategic partnerships and integrations form a key part of their ecosystem, supporting scalability and service quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of security.txt or similar files to facilitate vulnerability reporting. The company should consider publishing these documents and contacts to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but can be strengthened by formalizing policies and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security-related email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OnlineFundraising
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OnlineFundraising
Description
OnlineFundraising provides a future-proof payment and fundraising solution tailored to organizations' needs, enabling easy donation management, multiple payment methods, CRM integration, and telemarketing support.
Key services
Donation processing, Payment management, CRM integration, Telemarketing support, Multi-channel fundraising (web, SMS, street fundraising)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Bootstrap Grid, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or not publicly disclosed, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and common third-party integrations.
  4. Strong focus on non-profit fundraising payment solutions with multiple payment methods and CRM integrations.
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Multiple testimonials and a Gazelle 2024 award indicate business credibility.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. External links mostly to support subdomain and trusted third-party services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap grid, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It integrates with Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp for analytics and marketing automation. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and alternate language links. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is standard for professional business websites, supporting scalability and maintainability. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility compliance and optimize performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onlinefundraising.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onlinefundraising.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.