Skip to main content

Security report for onisystem.net

ONI system · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ONI system operates a vehicle monitoring and fleet management platform accessible via web and mobile applications. The service targets vehicle owners, fleet managers, partners, and dealers, offering functionalities such as vehicle tracking, controlling access, and demo testing without hardware installation. The website is functional and provides login portals for different user types but lacks visible contact or compliance information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and integrates Google Analytics and Lead Forensics for tracking. However, security headers are absent, and no privacy or cookie policies are presented, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is safe and professional in content but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onisystem.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be a niche provider in the transportation technology sector, focusing on vehicle monitoring and fleet control solutions. Its business model likely revolves around B2B SaaS combined with hardware integration. The presence of partner domains such as onisystem.cz suggests a partnership ecosystem. The lack of detailed company information, contact data, and certifications limits the ability to fully assess market positioning and growth potential. The demo and mobile app offerings indicate an effort to broaden accessibility and user engagement. Revenue streams are presumably from subscription or licensing fees for software and hardware services. Strategic partnerships and improved transparency could enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable deficiencies. The site uses HTTPS implied by URLs but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are visible, indicating potential GDPR non-compliance. The absence of contact information for incident response or security policies further weakens the security maturity. The WHOIS data absence is a red flag for domain legitimacy. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding incident response contacts, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ONI system
Description
ONI system provides vehicle monitoring and controlling solutions, including web and mobile applications for owners, partners, and dealers to monitor vehicles and drives. They offer demo access for testing without hardware installation.
Key services
Vehicle monitoring, Controlling access for partners and dealers, Mobile web application for vehicle monitoring, Demo access for testing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Platforms
Web, Mobile web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs
  • Login forms require credentials

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided on the page.
  4. Site uses Google Analytics and Lead Forensics for tracking.
  5. Login forms exist for owners and controlling partners but no visible security disclosures.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is suspicious.
  8. Content is safe and professional, focused on vehicle monitoring services.
  9. Mobile version of the app is available but mobile optimization is basic.
  10. No social media links or business certifications found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) with integration of Google Analytics and Lead Forensics for tracking and marketing insights. The site includes multiple login forms for different user roles and a mobile web app version. Performance appears moderate with no explicit issues detected. However, the absence of modern security headers and lack of visible CMS or hosting provider information suggest potential technical debt or limited infrastructure transparency. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO features are minimal. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security configurations, and enhance accessibility and SEO to better support business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onisystem.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onisystem.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.