Skip to main content

Security report for onepercentfortheplanet.org

1% for the Planet · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1% for the Planet is a globally recognized non-profit organization that certifies businesses committing to donate at least 1% of their annual sales to environmental causes. The website serves as a platform to promote membership, showcase environmental partners, and facilitate donations. It is positioned as a trusted certification authority with a strong network of partners and members worldwide. Technically, the site is built on Webflow and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Fundraise Up for donations. However, the site suffers from a critical security issue due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, which undermines user trust and data security. The site is content-rich, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information about its mission and impact. Privacy compliance is addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, while the business credibility and content quality are high, the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect users and maintain trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of onepercentfortheplanet.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onepercentfortheplanet.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit membership and certification body focused on environmental impact. Its business model revolves around certifying businesses and facilitating donations to vetted environmental organizations. The website highlights a broad and diverse partner ecosystem, including well-known brands like Patagonia and OXO, enhancing its market position. The target audience includes businesses seeking sustainability certification and environmentally conscious consumers. The site emphasizes growth benefits for members and provides detailed impact metrics, reinforcing its value proposition. The presence of multiple trusted certifications and a strong social media presence further supports its credibility and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, absence of security headers, and no HSTS implementation. While no critical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, the missing HTTPS is a critical flaw that exposes users to potential data interception and undermines trust. The site uses multiple third-party scripts, which increases the attack surface and necessitates rigorous monitoring. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could hinder timely mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is reasonably addressed, but improvements in security best practices are needed to align with industry standards and regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and resource count to improve load times and user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Webflow, leveraging a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Fundraise Up for donations. It uses multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the site suffers from slow load times due to a large number of resources and a large page size close to 1MB. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a significant technical risk. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern fonts and responsive design. There is room for technical improvements in security configuration and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 70/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onepercentfortheplanet.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onepercentfortheplanet.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.