Skip to main content

Security report for onboardsystems.com

Onboard Systems International · Transportation · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Onboard Systems International operates as a specialized manufacturer and supplier of aerospace cargo handling equipment, including cargo hooks and hoist and winch systems. The company appears to serve aerospace and transportation sectors, targeting industrial clients requiring reliable cargo handling solutions. The website presents a basic but functional digital presence, leveraging modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, alongside analytics tools like Google Analytics and Quantcast. However, the site lacks comprehensive content, privacy disclosures, and contact information, which limits its digital maturity and user trust. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or policies, and WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the business shows moderate professionalism but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and richer content to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of onboardsystems.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching onboardsystems.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself in a niche aerospace manufacturing market focused on cargo handling equipment. Its business model centers on manufacturing and supplying specialized hardware for aerospace and transportation industries. The presence of multiple sibling partner sites suggests a broader corporate ecosystem in aerospace and safety systems. The lack of detailed business information and contact data on the website limits visibility into revenue streams and growth indicators. The company likely targets aerospace manufacturers and industrial clients requiring certified cargo handling solutions. Strategic partnerships with related aerospace companies enhance its market positioning. However, the absence of public certifications or trust signals on the site may impact competitive advantage in regulated industries.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic and lacks several best practices. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, and no visible privacy or cookie policies to indicate GDPR or other compliance adherence. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy and transparency. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but SSL configuration details are unknown. Tracking scripts are present without visible user consent mechanisms, which may pose privacy compliance risks. No forms or input fields are detected, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks, but the lack of security policies and contact channels for incident response indicates low security maturity. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and incident response readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data unavailability to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience, SEO, and overall professionalism.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Onboard Systems International
Description
Onboard Systems International specializes in cargo hooks, hoist and winch systems primarily for aerospace and transportation sectors. The company offers products related to cargo handling and lifting equipment.
Key services
Cargo Hooks, Hoist and Winch Systems
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha1, jQuery 3.6.3, FontAwesome 6.7.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Quantcast, YWXI.net tracking
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Quantcast
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are present on the homepage.
  5. Site uses modern frontend technologies but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  6. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Quantcast are present without visible privacy disclosures.
  7. Branding is moderate with sister company links but limited trust signals.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected on the homepage.
  9. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha1 for responsive design, jQuery 3.6.3 for DOM manipulation, and FontAwesome 6.7.2 for icons. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Quantcast scripts. The site loads external fonts from Adobe Typekit and uses CDN resources from jsDelivr. The HTML structure is valid but minimal, with limited content and no forms. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO is minimal with only a title tag and empty meta description. Accessibility features are not explicitly detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be improved with richer content, enhanced SEO, and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with onboardsystems.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review onboardsystems.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.