Skip to main content

Security report for omalka.lv

IK O-placis · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IK O-placis operates a website omalka.lv offering firewood production, packaging, and delivery services primarily in Latvian regions including Ogre, Riga, and Aizkraukle. The business targets local consumers and companies requiring firewood, positioning itself as a regional supplier with a focus on quality and delivery convenience. The website content is straightforward, providing pricing, product types, and contact details, reflecting a small-scale retail operation. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.7.2 and Lightbox.js for image galleries, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site lacks modern security features such as HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating limited digital maturity and compliance readiness. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with no analytics or tracking scripts detected. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers presents a risk to data confidentiality and integrity. The outdated JavaScript library may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are visible, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting business credibility despite technical shortcomings. Overall, the website is functional for its business purpose but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trustworthiness and protect customer data. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, updating libraries, adding privacy and cookie policies, and improving security headers and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching omalka.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IK O-placis serves a niche local market in Latvia, focusing on firewood production and delivery. The business model is direct retail with packaging options and regional delivery, targeting both individual consumers and legal entities. The company leverages local presence and product quality as competitive advantages. Revenue streams are primarily from firewood sales in various forms and packaging. The website indicates a small business scale with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the developer multisoft.lv. Growth indicators are limited but the clear contact info and regional focus suggest stable local operations. The absence of advanced digital marketing or analytics tools indicates a traditional business approach with potential for digital expansion.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level, lacking HTTPS and security headers, which are fundamental for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version increases vulnerability exposure. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements applicable in Latvia. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, limiting the ability to manage security incidents effectively. The absence of security best practices and monitoring tools suggests a reactive rather than proactive security posture. These gaps pose risks to customer trust and data protection obligations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and provide contact channels for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
IK O-placis
Registration number
40002156264
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IK O-placis
Description
IK "O-placis" is a company producing and preparing various types of firewood for local market and export. They also package firewood in bags and boxes of any volume. They supply firewood in Ogres, Riga, and Aizkraukle regions.
Key services
Production and preparation of firewood, Packaging firewood in bags and boxes, Delivery in specific Latvian regions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Lightbox.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local business site for firewood sales and delivery in Latvia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data; likely HTTP or unknown.
  5. Uses outdated jQuery version 1.7.2 and Lightbox.js for image gallery.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links found.
  8. No forms detected on the page.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found beyond basic meta tags.
  10. No evidence of security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and uses jQuery 1.7.2 and Lightbox.js for client-side interactivity and image display. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by basic meta tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but outdated and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with omalka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review omalka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.