Skip to main content

Security report for olympiakomitea.fi

Olympiakomitea · Non-profit · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suomen Olympiakomitea is the central national organization for sports and physical activity in Finland, providing support and services to athletes, sports clubs, member organizations, and other stakeholders. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, comprehensive content, and active engagement through social media and newsletters. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager, AddSearch, and hCaptcha, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR and cookie regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching olympiakomitea.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as Finland's leading sports body, focusing on non-profit activities that promote sports and physical activity nationwide. Its business model revolves around service provision, advocacy, and community engagement rather than commercial revenue. The website targets a broad audience including athletes, coaches, sports clubs, policymakers, and the general public interested in sports. Partnerships with domains like suomisport.fi and toimintakykyinensuomi.fi indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The content and services suggest a medium-sized organization with a well-established reputation in the Finnish sports sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of hCaptcha for form protection, cookie consent banners, and standard security headers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information with direct phone numbers or emails for support and inquiries to improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olympiakomitea
Description
Suomen Olympiakomitea on suomalaisen liikunnan ja urheilun keskusjärjestö. Yhdessä verkostojemme kanssa rakennamme liikunnasta ja urheilusta elinvoimaa Suomeen.
Key services
Support for member organizations, Services for sports clubs, Athlete support, Coach and trainer services, Event organization and calendar, Information and advocacy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, AddSearch, hCaptcha, Juicer social feed, LianaMailer newsletter, Vimeo video embed, jQuery, HTMX
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddSearch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on Finnish sports community and stakeholders.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple language support (Finnish, English, Swedish).
  5. Extensive social media integration and active presence.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and services such as Google Tag Manager, AddSearch for search functionality, hCaptcha for bot protection, and Juicer for social media feeds. The site uses Vimeo for video content and integrates a newsletter system via LianaMailer. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD markup. The technical infrastructure is robust, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site shows no signs of technical debt or outdated technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with olympiakomitea.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review olympiakomitea.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.