Skip to main content

Security report for oliviagarden.eu

Olivia Garden · Retail · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Olivia Garden is a professional hair styling tools brand offering products such as hair brushes, combs, and scissors. The website targets professional hair stylists and consumers interested in hair care innovations. The brand appears established with a consistent and professional online presence. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for consent management, and reCAPTCHA for bot protection, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, with room for improvement in transparency of security policies and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oliviagarden.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Olivia Garden operates in the retail sector specializing in professional hair care tools. The business model focuses on manufacturing and selling high-quality hair styling products. The website's use of multiple advertising and tracking platforms such as Google Ads, Meta Ads, and TikTok Ads suggests active marketing efforts targeting a broad audience. The absence of explicit contact details and WHOIS privacy protection is typical for commercial retail websites. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages analytics and consent management tools to optimize user experience and comply with privacy regulations. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers in place. The use of Cookiebot for granular cookie consent and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation are positive indicators. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through the cookie consent and privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Olivia Garden
Description
Explore our professional hair styling tools, hair brushes, combs, and scissors. Learn about our brand, and stay updated with hair care innovations.
Key services
Hair styling tools, Hair brushes, Combs, Scissors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Vue.js (inferred from script naming and structure)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta (Facebook) Ads, TikTok Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with good security headers
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories
  3. No WHOIS data available due to privacy protection
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. Privacy policy present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework, likely Vue.js, combined with Google Tag Manager and analytics tools for performance monitoring and marketing. Cookiebot is integrated for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site is served over HTTPS with appropriate security headers, indicating good hosting and security practices. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly identified. The technical stack supports a professional and scalable e-commerce presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oliviagarden.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oliviagarden.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.