Skip to main content

Security report for oldmapster.com

OldMapster - Maps with soul · Retail · Slovenia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OldMapster is a small retail e-commerce business specializing in the sale of antique maps, archive charts, and vintage plots. The company targets collectors, history enthusiasts, and customers seeking unique decorative items. The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, and Mailchimp. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with consistent branding and clear contact information, but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oldmapster.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oldmapster.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for oldmapster.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OldMapster occupies a niche market within the retail sector, focusing on antique and vintage maps. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, leveraging digital marketing and social media channels to reach a specialized audience. The company appears to be small-sized, founded around 2020, with a clear geographic base in Slovenia. The presence of structured data and social media links indicates an awareness of SEO and digital presence strategies. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The business benefits from a consistent brand identity and a focused product offering, positioning it well within its niche but with limited scale.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable DNS and registrar services, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of reCAPTCHA on forms (implied by scripts) helps mitigate automated abuse. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OldMapster - Maps with soul
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OldMapster - Maps with soul
Description
Explore OldMapster’s collection of antique maps, archive charts, and vintage plots. Perfect for collectors, history enthusiasts, and those seeking unique decor.
Key services
Sale of antique maps, Archive charts, Vintage plots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Cloudflare DNS, Google reCAPTCHA, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, Chimp (Mailchimp)
Frameworks
Astra Theme, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cloudflare DNS with clientTransferProhibited status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche e-commerce platform selling antique maps and charts.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page content.
  3. Contact info is present and consistent with business location.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No visible forms in provided HTML content; likely uses JavaScript or separate pages for contact forms.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating ease of content management and flexibility. It uses several third-party services for analytics and marketing, including Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, and Mailchimp. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with some optimization potential. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could be enhanced with improved security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oldmapster.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oldmapster.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.