Skip to main content

Security report for ogrodniak.pl

Real Estate · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ogrodniak.pl is a professional landscape architecture studio based in Łódź, Poland, specializing in designing, creating, and maintaining private and commercial gardens. The website presents a strong market position as a local expert with a comprehensive range of services including garden design, lawn installation, garden care, fertilization, irrigation systems, and use of professional gardening equipment. The business targets individual clients, companies, and property managers, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and attention to detail. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and Google reCAPTCHA integration, although explicit privacy and cookie policies are missing, which impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ogrodniak.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ogrodniak.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ogrodniak.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ogrodniak operates in the real estate and landscaping sector, focusing on garden architecture and maintenance services. Their business model revolves around project-based landscaping services with free site visits and customized quotes, targeting a local market in Łódź and surrounding areas. The company leverages a digital presence with a content-rich website showcasing projects and services, supported by modern web technologies. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. The company emphasizes customer satisfaction and detailed project execution, which supports a strong competitive advantage in the local market. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, with Google Tag Manager and Vercel Analytics. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of multiple security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and security practices.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Profesjonalna pracownia architektury krajobrazu w Łodzi. Tworzymy ogrody prywatne i komercyjne, projektujemy zieleń, wprowadzamy zrównoważone rozwiązania i dbamy o każdy detal aranżacji.
Key services
projektowanie ogrodów, zakładanie trawników, pielęgnacja ogrodów, nawozy i środki ochrony roślin, nawadnianie ogrodów, usługi sprzętem ogrodniczym, urządzanie ogrodów
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Sanity CMS, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks with security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Vercel Analytics)
Marketing tools
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to landscaping and garden architecture.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Vercel.
  6. Security best practices are followed with HTTPS and security headers.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. No visible forms in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via dedicated pages not included here.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js framework with React, leveraging Sanity CMS for content management and hosted on Vercel platform, which provides scalable and performant infrastructure. The site uses modern web standards including responsive design, preloading of fonts and images, and optimized image delivery via next/image. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for bot protection. Analytics and tag management are handled via Vercel Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site exhibits fast loading times and good accessibility features. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) for business and contact information and improving privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ogrodniak.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ogrodniak.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.