Skip to main content

Security report for ofop.eu

Ogólnopolska Federacja Organizacji Pozarządowych · Non-profit · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ogólnopolska Federacja Organizacji Pozarządowych (OFOP) is a Polish non-profit federation established in 2003 to represent and support NGOs at local, national, and European levels. The organization focuses on advocacy, monitoring European funds, capacity building, and fostering dialogue within the NGO sector. The website reflects a well-structured and professional digital presence, leveraging WordPress with modern plugins and tools to deliver content and services effectively. GDPR compliance is evident through a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Contact information is primarily via a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, OFOP demonstrates a credible and trustworthy online presence aligned with its mission and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ofop.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ofop.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ofop.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OFOP holds a strong position as a national federation for NGOs in Poland, providing advocacy and support services. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on member services, training, and monitoring of European funds. The organization targets Polish NGOs and civil society actors, with partnerships including specialized monitoring platforms and NGO networks. The website content and structure support its role as a sector leader, with active news updates and program information. Revenue streams likely include grants and membership fees. The federation's strategic focus on European integration and NGO capacity building positions it well for continued influence and growth.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools to comply with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy and security approach. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good for a non-profit organization, with recommendations to strengthen header policies and publish security contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance visibility of direct contact information for business and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ogólnopolska Federacja Organizacji Pozarządowych
Description
Federation representing Polish non-governmental organizations, established in 2003, focused on advocacy, integration, and support of NGOs at local, national, and European levels.
Key services
Advocacy at national and European levels, Monitoring of European funds, Training and capacity building (e.g., School of Representation and Social Participation), Information dissemination and publications, Member organization support and networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Cookie Law Info plugin, WP Accessibility plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (WP Accessibility, Cookie Law Info)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Polish with some English language option available.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form present.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No certifications or DPO contact information explicitly stated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins like WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and Cookie Law Info. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some large images and scripts but overall responsive design. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include improving security headers and possibly optimizing performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ofop.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ofop.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.