Skip to main content

Security report for oepfelchasper.ch

Öpfelchasper GmbH · Transportation · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Öpfelchasper GmbH is a small Swiss company specializing in the delivery of organic fruits and vegetables to urban customers, including offices and private homes. Their business model centers on eco-friendly bicycle courier delivery, emphasizing bio-quality and CO2-neutral logistics. The company offers subscription services, gift vouchers, and extras to enhance customer experience. Their market position is that of a niche local provider with a strong sustainability focus. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, ensuring good performance and security. The website is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a professional design and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR indicators. Contact information is transparent and consistent with WHOIS data, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy, professional, and user-friendly platform for its target audience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and adding incident response contacts to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oepfelchasper.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Öpfelchasper operates in the transportation and retail sectors, focusing on organic produce delivery via bicycle couriers in Swiss cities such as Zurich, Basel, Bern, and Winterthur. Their competitive advantage lies in sustainability, local sourcing, and personalized subscription models. Revenue streams include direct sales, subscriptions, and gift vouchers. The company targets environmentally conscious urban consumers and businesses. Active social media presence and newsletter engagement indicate growth and customer retention efforts. Partnerships with climate organizations and brand manual providers suggest a commitment to transparency and quality branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF protection on forms, and no visible sensitive data leaks. Tracking scripts are standard but well managed. The absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security risks are low, but enhancements in header policies and transparency would benefit the security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy with clear contact channels.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing a data protection officer contact or privacy liaison.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and user expectations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Öpfelchasper GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Öpfelchasper GmbH
Description
Wir beliefern Stadtmenschen mit frischen Früchten und knackigem Gemüse: in Bio-Qualität und immer mit dem Velo. Für ein rundum gesundes Genusserlebnis.
Key services
Bio fruit and vegetable delivery for offices, Bio fruit and vegetable delivery for homes, Gift vouchers and subscriptions, Extras with bio baskets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cloudflare CDN, Picturefill (polyfill for responsive images), Tingle.js (modal library)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF token in newsletter form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile responsiveness.
  2. Strong focus on organic, local, and eco-friendly delivery services.
  3. Multiple social media channels and newsletter subscription indicate active engagement.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy gaps; GDPR compliance is indicated.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with lazy loading images and responsive design techniques. It leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations, and Cloudflare CDN for hosting and performance optimization. The use of polyfills like Picturefill ensures compatibility with older browsers. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in image delivery and script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site generator approach.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oepfelchasper.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oepfelchasper.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.