Skip to main content

Security report for odlo.com

Odlo · Retail · Switzerland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Odlo is a well-established sportswear brand specializing in functional underwear and sports apparel, targeting active individuals and athletes primarily in Europe. The company operates a professional e-commerce platform offering direct sales of its products. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern design, mobile optimization, and implemented privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure includes modern CSS frameworks and third-party marketing tools, supporting a moderate performance and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent, though additional security headers could enhance protection. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or limited public registration information, which slightly impacts trust but is common for commercial brands. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR, supporting a trustworthy online presence for Odlo.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching odlo.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Odlo positions itself as a mid-sized retail brand in the sportswear sector, focusing on functional and performance apparel. Its business model centers on direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales, supported by a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. The company targets active and sports-oriented consumers, leveraging online marketing and social media channels for engagement. The website's integration of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates awareness of regulatory compliance. While WHOIS data is limited, the brand's market presence and professional website suggest a legitimate and established operation. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital marketing efforts and enhancing technical infrastructure for improved performance and security.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a baseline security posture aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party scripts for marketing and consent introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. Incident response and security policy documentation were not found, suggesting an opportunity to enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from additional hardening and formalized security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to improve domain trustworthiness and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Odlo AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Odlo
Description
Odlo is a sportswear brand specializing in functional underwear and sports apparel, targeting active individuals and athletes.
Key services
Sportswear sales, Functional underwear, Online shopping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, JavaScript, Cookiebot, Scarab Research recommender
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Scarab Research
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Scarab Research
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and functional.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  5. No explicit or adult content detected.
  6. Uses modern CSS framework (Tailwind CSS).
  7. Includes third-party marketing and consent scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes Tailwind CSS for styling and includes JavaScript libraries for cookie consent (Cookiebot) and product recommendations (Scarab Research). The HTML structure is modern and responsive, supporting good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of third-party scripts and resource loading. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. Accessibility is basic, with scope for enhancements to meet higher standards. The technical stack supports a professional e-commerce experience but should be regularly reviewed to address technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with odlo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review odlo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.