Skip to main content

Security report for oculus.com

Meta · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.meta.com/quest is a part of Meta Platforms, Inc., focusing on their Meta Quest virtual reality products. However, the content is fully gated behind a login wall requiring a Meta account, preventing access to substantive content without authentication. The site uses advanced React-based frameworks and Facebook's internal technologies, indicating a modern technical infrastructure. Security posture and privacy compliance cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content and missing WHOIS data. The domain is legitimate but WHOIS transparency is limited, likely due to corporate privacy policies. Overall, the site is a secure, enterprise-grade platform but inaccessible for public analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 8 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oculus.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oculus.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
166,159
Employees
27
Customers
165,951
Third parties
181
Weak passwords
15%

Latest record dated 2026-05-17 · 91 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for oculus.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –auth.oculus.com2026-05-17
  • –shop.oculus.com2026-05-16
  • –auth.oculus.com2026-05-15
  • –auth.oculus.com2026-05-13
  • –secure.oculus.com2026-05-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Meta is a leading global technology company with a strong market position in social media and virtual reality. The Meta Quest product line targets consumers interested in VR hardware and software. The business model revolves around product sales and platform services. The website integrates multiple marketing and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of publicly accessible contact or policy information on this page limits direct customer engagement. The domain's WHOIS data is not publicly available, consistent with large corporate privacy practices.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the login requirement blocking content access. No security headers or SSL details were extractable from the provided data. The site uses HTTPS and Facebook's internal frameworks, which are generally secure. The presence of extensive tracking pixels suggests a need for careful privacy management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the accessible content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly visible on this page.

Recommendations

  1. Provide publicly accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Publish contact information and security incident response details for better trust and support.
  3. Ensure security headers and SSL configurations are properly implemented and publicly verifiable.
  4. Consider providing a public landing page with basic product and company information without login.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features on publicly accessible pages to improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked behind a login wall requiring Meta account authentication. The page shows a login prompt with no accessible content, indicating restricted access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Meta
Description
Meta is a technology company focused on social media platforms and virtual reality products. The page is related to Meta Quest, their VR product line.
Key services
Virtual reality hardware (Meta Quest), Social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram), Online account services
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS, Facebook internal frameworks
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web

Analytics and tracking

Services
google_analytics_4_tag, meta_pixel, linkedin_insight, pinterest_ads_pixel, reddit_pixel, snapchat_pixel, tiktok_analytics_pixel, twitter_analytics_pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
meta_pixel
Marketing tools
google_ads_pixel_legacy, google_analytics_4_tag, google_double_click_uri_connect, linkedin_insight, pinterest_ads_pixel, reddit_pixel, salesforce_chat, snapchat_pixel, tealium_cdn, tiktok_analytics_pixel, twitter_analytics_pixel, twitter_legacy_embed, vidyard_video_embed, youtube_embed, youtube_iframe_api
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible without login, blocking full content analysis.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the accessible page.
  3. No contact information or forms are accessible without authentication.
  4. Site uses extensive Facebook/Meta internal JavaScript frameworks and assets.
  5. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data.
  6. Site heavily integrates tracking and marketing pixels from multiple providers.
  7. Content safety is high with no adult or questionable content detected.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, typical for large corporate domains with privacy or registry restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Facebook's internal JavaScript frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. The site loads numerous JavaScript and CSS resources from Facebook's CDN infrastructure. However, the content is gated behind a login wall, limiting performance and SEO analysis. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The site likely benefits from Facebook's global CDN and infrastructure for performance and reliability. Accessibility and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content blocking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oculus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oculus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.