Skip to main content

Security report for obud.pl

OBUD.pl · Real Estate · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OBUD.pl is a well-established Polish online portal specializing in the construction industry, providing news, expert advice, and product information targeted at professionals and enthusiasts in the sector. Founded in 2008, it maintains a strong market presence with a comprehensive content structure covering various construction-related topics. The website integrates advertising and partner links to monetize its content effectively. Technically, the site employs modern frontend frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and basic security best practices but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is addressed through a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, though terms of service and incident response policies are not evident. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and moderately secure, with room for enhancements in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obud.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal operates as an informational and advertising platform within the Polish construction sector, targeting professionals and industry stakeholders. Its business model relies on content publication, advertising revenue, and partnerships with related industry sites such as chemiabudowlana.info and oknoserwis.pl. The site’s extensive categorization and active social media presence support user engagement and market reach. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm a legitimate and consistent business operation. The absence of phone contact and physical address may limit direct customer engagement but is typical for online media portals. The partnership ecosystem and advertising integrations suggest a stable revenue stream and strategic positioning within the niche market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. Multiple redundant analytics scripts could introduce performance and security risks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in security maturity. The site’s privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy but no detailed GDPR or NIS2 compliance documentation. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational portal but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen security.
  2. Consolidate and optimize analytics scripts to reduce redundancy and potential security risks.
  3. Publish explicit terms of service, security policy, and incident response information to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance documentation with detailed GDPR adherence and data retention policies.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations for vulnerabilities and performance impact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OBUD.pl
Description
Portal oferujący aktualności, wiedzę i inspiracje z branży budowlanej, w tym technologie, materiały, porady ekspertów oraz rozwiązania dla profesjonalistów.
Key services
Publikacja artykułów i porad budowlanych, Informacje o nowościach produktowych, Forum dyskusyjne, Newsletter, Reklama branżowa
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Revive Adserver, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Revive Adserver
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Polish construction industry portal with extensive categorized content.
  2. Multiple Google Analytics and Facebook SDK scripts are loaded, indicating active tracking and marketing efforts.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided in the visible content.
  7. Contact email redakcja@obud.pl is provided.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap.
  9. Advertising is served via Google Adsense and Revive Adserver.
  10. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK, loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. Advertising is managed via Google Adsense and Revive Adserver. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. However, the presence of multiple redundant analytics scripts suggests technical debt and potential performance degradation. No CMS is explicitly detected, and hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in security header implementation and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obud.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obud.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.