Skip to main content

Security report for obrancizvirat.cz

OBRAZ – Obránci zvířat, z. s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OBRAZ – Obránci zvířat is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to animal protection through public education, advocacy, and systemic reform campaigns. Established in 2014, it maintains a medium-sized presence with active regional groups and multiple ongoing campaigns. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting the Czech-speaking public interested in animal welfare. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, hosted with reputable providers and using Cloudflare DNS. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with good content quality and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR, with clear contact information and active social media engagement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of obrancizvirat.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obrancizvirat.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on animal rights and welfare. Its business model relies on advocacy, public campaigns, and community engagement rather than commercial revenue. The website links to partner campaign sites, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of donation calls and contact forms suggests fundraising activities. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's history, supporting legitimacy. The target audience includes activists, donors, and the general public interested in animal protection. The organization maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, which supports its credibility and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which enhances security and availability. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in mechanisms, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could limit transparency in case of security events. The forms use nonce tokens, reducing risk of CSRF attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adding security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Add explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities from outdated software.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OBRAZ – Obránci zvířat, z. s.
Registration number
03730859
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OBRAZ – Obránci zvířat, z. s.
Description
Nezisková organizace usilující o lepší společenskou ochranu zvířat. Vedeme kampaně zaměřené na vzdělávání veřejnosti a prosazování systémových reforem.
Key services
Animal protection campaigns, Public education, Advocacy for systemic reforms, Regional activism support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ManyChat
Marketing tools
ManyChat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit animal protection organization
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured
  3. Multiple active campaigns and calls to action
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS
  7. Clear contact information including email, phone, and address
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube
  9. No detected WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with popular plugins like Contact Form 7 and Yoast SEO, combined with WPBakery and Elementor page builders. It loads external resources from Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is via WEDOS registrar with Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS-level protection and performance benefits. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery 3.7.1. Performance is moderate, with some custom CSS and JavaScript for UI enhancements. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. There is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obrancizvirat.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obrancizvirat.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.