Skip to main content

Security report for nupraatikerover.be

Nupraatikerover.be · Non-profit · Belgium

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nupraatikerover.be is a non-profit organization providing anonymous chat support services for minors who are victims of sexual violence, abuse, or neglect. The website is designed to offer a safe, free, and confidential environment for vulnerable youth to seek help at their own pace. The organization targets a niche audience within Belgium, focusing on child protection and support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several plugins including CleanTalk for anti-spam protection. It integrates multiple tracking and analytics services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks some advanced accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses anti-spam measures but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. WHOIS data is restricted, which is common for privacy protection in sensitive non-profit sectors. No signs of WAF or content blocking were detected, and the site appears accessible and legitimate. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for its mission but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy policies, security headers, and incident response information to strengthen its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nupraatikerover.be

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nupraatikerover.be occupies a specialized position in the non-profit sector, focusing on providing anonymous support to minors affected by abuse in Belgium. Its competitive advantage lies in its anonymity, free access, and targeted support services. The business model is service-oriented, relying likely on public funding or donations, though no explicit monetization or funding information is provided. The target customer segment is minors in need of confidential help. The presence of social media channels suggests an active outreach and partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators are not explicit but the use of modern web technologies and tracking tools indicates ongoing digital engagement efforts.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and anti-spam plugins are active, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing explicit privacy and security policies, which are critical for GDPR adherence given the sensitive nature of the service and the target audience. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact information for security incidents. The security culture appears basic but could be improved with formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and security policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information to improve readiness and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to ensure inclusivity for all users, including those with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nupraatikerover.be
Description
Chatbox voor minderjarigen die slachtoffer zijn van seksueel geweld, mishandeling of verwaarlozing. Ben je minderjarig en slachtoffer van mishandeling, verwaarlozing of seksueel geweld? Bij ons chat je anoniem, gratis en op jouw tempo. Wij zijn er voor jóu.
Key services
Anonymous chat support for sexual violence, abuse, neglect victims
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetEngine plugin, JetPopup plugin, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk) active
  • Use of security pixels for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is focused on anonymous chat support for minors who are victims of abuse.
  2. WHOIS data is restricted, likely for privacy reasons.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Cookie policy with consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. Multiple tracking pixels from major platforms are used.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and several plugins.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. Content is in Dutch (nl-NL) and targeted at Belgian minors.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Elementor page builder and several plugins for functionality and security (CleanTalk). It uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking services, which may introduce privacy considerations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires enhancements in security and compliance to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nupraatikerover.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nupraatikerover.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.