Skip to main content

Security report for nuori.fi

Lasten ja nuorten säätiö · Non-profit · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lasten ja nuorten säätiö is a Finnish non-profit foundation dedicated to strengthening the future confidence of children and youth across Finland. Established in 2011, the foundation operates nationwide and reaches tens of thousands of young people annually through various support and educational programs. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, providing clear information about its mission, donation methods, and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager, hosted on infrastructure inferred from its nameservers. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though DNSSEC is not implemented and no explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the organization's identity, enhancing trust and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nuori.fi

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nuori.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nuori.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position within the Finnish non-profit sector focused on youth welfare. Its business model relies on donations and public trust, supported by transparent communication and police-approved fundraising licenses. The website's multilingual capabilities and clear donation instructions indicate a mature digital presence aimed at maximizing outreach and donor engagement. Partnerships with payment processors like MobilePay enhance operational efficiency. The organization maintains consistent branding and content quality, reinforcing its credibility and appeal to its target audience of children, youth, and supporters in Finland.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and YouTube iframe API is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected in the analysis. Enhancing transparency around security incident handling and vulnerability disclosure would further strengthen the security culture and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lasten ja nuorten säätiö
Registration number
1726086-1
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lasten ja nuorten säätiö
Description
Lasten ja nuorten säätiö vahvistaa lasten ja nuorten tulevaisuususkoa. Säätiö tavoittaa vuosittain kymmeniä tuhansia lapsia ja nuoria ympäri Suomen.
Key services
Youth support programs, Fundraising and donations, Educational initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the non-profit sector.
  3. Clear donation instructions and multiple language support available.
  4. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  5. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with jQuery and Google Tag Manager integration, indicating a modern and maintainable technology stack. Hosting appears to be provided by Cloudpit based on nameserver data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata effectively for SEO and social media sharing. Some technical debt may exist in accessibility features and DNS security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the foundation's mission and provides a reliable user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nuori.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nuori.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.