Skip to main content

Security report for novipocetak.hr

Dom za žrtve nasilja u obitelji NOVI POČETAK · Non-profit · Croatia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dom za žrtve nasilja u obitelji NOVI POČETAK is a Croatian social care institution dedicated to supporting victims of domestic violence and their children. Founded and operated under the auspices of the Krapinsko-zagorska županija regional government, it provides safe accommodation, psychosocial counseling, and professional social work services. The website reflects a well-structured, professionally designed platform with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, integrating Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics purposes. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though it lacks published security policies and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR in terms of privacy policy presence, but could improve cookie consent and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching novipocetak.hr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit social care provider focused on domestic violence victims in Croatia, supported primarily by regional government funding and supplemented by donor contributions. Its market position is regional and essential, providing critical social services. The business model centers on government and donor funding rather than commercial revenue. The website demonstrates transparency with donor acknowledgments and EU co-financing logos, indicating strong partnership ecosystems. Growth indicators include active news updates and public tenders. Strategic observations suggest a stable operation with potential to enhance digital maturity by adopting more explicit privacy and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, modern security headers, and integration of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response plan and lack of a vulnerability disclosure mechanism represent compliance gaps. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with EU regulations.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy notices on all forms to explicitly inform users about data processing.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dom za žrtve nasilja u obitelji NOVI POČETAK
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dom za žrtve nasilja u obitelji NOVI POČETAK
Description
Dom za žrtve nasilja u obitelji NOVI POČETAK je ustanova socijalne skrbi, čiji je osnivač Krapinsko-zagorska županija.
Key services
safe accommodation at secret address, psychosocial support and counseling, professional social work and legal advice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-affiliated social care institution for victims of domestic violence.
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented in Croatian language.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  4. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism despite EU regulations.
  6. No visible security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses Google Analytics via MonsterInsights plugin for traffic analysis and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection on forms. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features including an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Structured data is implemented via JSON-LD for SEO benefits. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks are low but could be further reduced by ensuring all plugins are up to date and by adding explicit privacy and security disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with novipocetak.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review novipocetak.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.