Skip to main content

Security report for notfallwebsite.com

in2code GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.notfallwebsite.com is operated by in2code GmbH, a German company specializing in providing a robust, cloud-hosted TYPO3 emergency website solution designed to maintain communication capabilities during cyberattacks or IT infrastructure incidents. The service targets universities, public institutions, and private companies, offering a scalable, hardened platform that serves static HTML content to minimize attack surfaces. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on emergency communication continuity. Technically, the site leverages modern compression algorithms (Brotli, GZip), a CDN, and AWS cloud infrastructure to ensure performance and resilience. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Security posture is solid with hardened CMS usage and scalable hosting, though explicit HTTP security headers and published security policies are absent. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some legitimacy concerns, but the professional presentation and clear contact details mitigate risk. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with recommendations to enhance security headers and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching notfallwebsite.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention notfallwebsite.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for notfallwebsite.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

in2code GmbH positions itself as a niche provider of emergency TYPO3 websites, addressing a growing market need for institutions vulnerable to cyberattacks, such as universities, public sector entities, and private enterprises. Their SaaS offering emphasizes minimal customization, high availability, and rapid scalability via AWS. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and GDPR compliance, leveraging Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The partnership with in2code.de strengthens their market credibility. The business model relies on low monthly fees and standby mode operation, appealing to organizations requiring cost-effective emergency communication solutions. Growth potential exists in expanding to additional sectors and enhancing incident response services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security approach by deploying a hardened TYPO3 CMS that serves static HTML to reduce attack vectors. The use of AWS cloud infrastructure allows flexible scaling to withstand denial-of-service attacks. Cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicate attention to data protection. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for trust and legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating privacy compliance measures, including cookie consent and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
in2code GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
in2code GmbH
Description
An externally hosted, slim and highly secure TYPO3 emergency website solution designed to maintain communication and online presence during hacker attacks or IT incidents.
Key services
Emergency TYPO3 website hosting, Robust, scalable cloud infrastructure, Minimal layout customization, Communication channel during IT incidents
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Brotli compression, GZip compression, Content Delivery Network (CDN), JavaScript modules (Lux, Powermail)
Frameworks
TYPO3
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of hardened TYPO3 system serving static HTML
  • Cloud-based scalable hosting to mitigate DoS
  • Cookie consent modal with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Content is in German and targets institutions vulnerable to cyberattacks.
  3. Strong emphasis on emergency communication and robust TYPO3-based solution.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  8. Use of modern compression and CDN technologies for performance and resilience.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected; analytics via Matomo used responsibly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with a focus on delivering a lightweight, static HTML emergency website. It uses modern compression techniques (Brotli, GZip) and a CDN to optimize performance and reduce load times. Hosting is provided via Amazon Web Services, enabling rapid scalability to handle traffic spikes during incidents. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. JavaScript libraries include Lux and Powermail for form handling and UI enhancements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical implementation is modern and robust, though the lack of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with notfallwebsite.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review notfallwebsite.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.