Skip to main content

Security report for norsketog.no

Norske Tog AS · Transportation · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Norske Tog AS is a Norwegian state-owned enterprise responsible for procuring, owning, and managing passenger train vehicles in Norway. The company holds a key position in the national transportation sector, focusing on ensuring modern and efficient rolling stock for passenger rail services. Their website provides comprehensive information about their projects, train types, sustainability efforts, and investor relations, targeting both the general public and industry stakeholders. Technically, the website is well-implemented with modern JavaScript, SVG graphics, and privacy-focused analytics (Plausible). It is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the site projects professionalism and trustworthiness, though the lack of WHOIS data from the Norid registry is a notable gap requiring verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching norsketog.no

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention norsketog.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for norsketog.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Norske Tog operates in the transportation sector, specifically in rail passenger vehicle ownership and management. Their business model centers on state ownership and long-term asset management rather than direct passenger services. The company collaborates with multiple train operators and partners such as Entur, Go-Ahead Nordic, SJ, and Vy, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on sustainability and modernization projects. The presence of investor relations and project updates indicates transparency and active stakeholder engagement. The company targets Norwegian residents and transport sector stakeholders, positioning itself as a critical infrastructure entity within Norway's public transport framework.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Forms are implemented with standard controls, and no vulnerable libraries or scripts were detected. However, the absence of common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional headers and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency by verifying domain registration details and ensuring consistency with corporate identity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Norske Tog AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Norske Tog AS
Description
Norske tog anskaffer, eier og forvalter kjøretøy til persontogtrafikk i Norge.
Key services
Procurement of passenger trains, Ownership and management of train vehicles, Project management for new trains, Information on train routes and seat maps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG graphics, Plausible Analytics
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with reset and submit buttons

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available from Norid WHOIS server for this domain.
  3. Clear corporate identity and contact information present.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with privacy focus.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. External links mainly to official partners and related transport companies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, SVG for graphics, and a privacy-respecting analytics platform (Plausible). The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and accessibility considerations such as skip links and ARIA attributes. Performance appears optimized with lazy loading of images and responsive design for mobile devices. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks some advanced frameworks but maintains a clean and efficient technical stack. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and add more explicit metadata for enhanced SEO and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with norsketog.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review norsketog.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.