Skip to main content

Security report for norrkopingshamn.se

Norrköpings Hamn · Transportation · Sweden

Partial score · DNS & email only

46/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Norrköpings Hamn is a prominent Swedish port operator focused on providing modern and sustainable port services. The company serves a broad range of national and international customers, offering key services such as break bulk, bulk, container and intermodal logistics, liquid bulk, project cargo, and terminal services. The website reflects a well-established business with a clear market position as one of Sweden's largest ports, emphasizing sustainability and customer engagement through events and interactive content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, GSAP, and Swiper for enhanced user experience. It employs standard web technologies and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Plausible, alongside a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via the Complianz GDPR plugin. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a professional and user-friendly interface. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks explicit security policy or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding dedicated security policies and improving security headers. Overall, Norrköpings Hamn's website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, compliance with privacy regulations, and a strong business presence. Strategic recommendations include formalizing security policies, enhancing incident response readiness, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching norrkopingshamn.se

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
46

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Norrköpings Hamn operates in the transportation and energy sectors, focusing on port and logistics services. Its business model revolves around facilitating cargo handling and terminal operations for diverse cargo types. The company targets businesses involved in shipping and logistics, both domestically and internationally. The website highlights ongoing development projects and customer engagement initiatives, indicating growth and modernization efforts. The presence of multiple service offerings and customer-centric content suggests a diversified revenue stream and a strong market position. The company maintains active social media channels and provides comprehensive contact information, reinforcing its commitment to transparency and customer service.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in implementing headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others. There is no visible security or incident response policy, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of reputable plugins and libraries reduces the risk of vulnerabilities, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and enforce security headers like CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Norrköpings Hamn
Description
Tillsammans utvecklar vi morgondagens moderna och hållbara hamn. Sveriges närmaste hamn med tjänster inom break bulk, bulk, container & intermodalt, flytande bulk, projektlaster/tunglyft, terminal, och mer.
Key services
Break bulk, Bulk, Container & Intermodalt, Flytande bulk, Projektlaster/Tunglyft, Terminal services, Customer services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, jQuery, GSAP, Swiper, MediaElement.js, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Avada
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with active consent management.
  3. Multiple social media links and active content updates.
  4. Professional and consistent branding and design.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS with Avada theme.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, GSAP, Swiper, and MediaElement.js for enhanced interactivity and media handling. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Plausible for analytics and tracking, alongside the Complianz GDPR plugin for privacy compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, with responsive design and semantic HTML usage. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and resource management. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience, suitable for a medium-sized enterprise in the transportation sector.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with norrkopingshamn.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review norrkopingshamn.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.