Skip to main content

Security report for nordlux.com

Nordlux · Design · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordlux.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nordlux operates in the retail sector, targeting consumers and businesses interested in Scandinavian lighting products. The company leverages a hybrid business model combining in-house design with sourced products, positioning itself as a quality yet affordable lighting brand. The website's integration with multiple marketing and analytics platforms indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and advertising. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of direct contact information may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with a consistent brand presence and a focus on digital marketing. Strategic partnerships with platforms like Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, and Pinterest support its advertising and retargeting efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with the implementation of cookie consent and CSRF protection mechanisms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools increases the attack surface and requires careful management of data privacy and security. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, as it may indicate privacy protection or registration issues that affect domain trustworthiness. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, there is room for improvement in policy transparency, header implementation, and domain legitimacy verification.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website.
  3. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Verify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordlux
Description
Since Nordlux’ establishment in 1977, it has been our mission to offer lighting products at attractive prices. Since the beginning, we maintained a combination of sourced products and in-house design.
Key services
Lighting product sales, In-house design, Sourced product distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Application Insights, Cookiebot, Umbraco Forms, Sleeknote, Videoly
Frameworks
Umbraco CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • CSRF protection cookie (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Application Insights
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Sleeknote
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, YouTube tracking
Marketing tools
Sleeknote
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories and providers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page detected in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the analyzed content.
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services with extensive tracking.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  7. Website uses Umbraco CMS and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools.
  8. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not visible in the provided data.
  9. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordlux.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordlux.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.