Skip to main content

Security report for nordicbridgefund.se

Alfakraft Luxembourg S.A. SICAV · Real Estate · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordic Bridge Fund is a specialized real estate direct lending fund focusing on the Nordic SME market, managed by Alfakraft Luxembourg S.A. SICAV. The fund aims to provide investors with stable returns by offering collateral-backed financing solutions, addressing a financing gap in the Nordic real estate sector. The website presents a professional image with clear business information and investment details, targeting investors interested in alternative real estate financing. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern page builder tools, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, representing compliance and security improvement opportunities. Overall, the website is credible and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordicbridgefund.se

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nordicbridgefund.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nordicbridgefund.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The fund operates in a niche market segment providing direct lending to small and medium-sized real estate companies in the Nordic region, leveraging partnerships with established financial managers and investment platforms. Its business model focuses on collateral-centric lending to mitigate risk and provide steady returns. The website's content and external links indicate a well-integrated partnership ecosystem with Alfakraft as the AIFM and distribution through Avanza, Nordnet, and Alpcot. The absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggests a focus on professional investor audiences rather than mass retail. The fund's market positioning addresses a financing gap created by tighter bank lending regulations, offering a competitive advantage in this segment.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or inputs collecting sensitive data were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by including data protection officer contact details and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Alfakraft Luxembourg S.A. SICAV
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alfakraft Luxembourg S.A. SICAV
Description
Nordic Bridge Fund is a specialized real asset-backed financing fund managed by seasoned property experts, targeting 4-7% annual net returns above the risk-free rate. The fund provides investors with exposure to the Nordic real estate market while mitigating price risk associated with valuation fluctuations. It is managed by an experienced AIFM with over 25 years of expertise in alternative investments and asset management.
Key services
Real estate direct lending, Collateral-centric asset management, Monthly NAV valuation, Exposure to Nordic real estate market
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Colibri Page Builder, Fancybox, Stockdio Stock Market Ticker
Frameworks
Colibri Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear sections about the fund, background, and contact information.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Use of WordPress and Colibri Page Builder indicates a modern CMS but no advanced analytics or tracking detected.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information provided.
  8. External links mostly to investment platforms and regulatory documents.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Colibri Page Builder plugin, leveraging jQuery and Fancybox for UI interactions. It uses Google Fonts and integrates a stock market ticker plugin. The site loads external resources from trusted domains and investment platforms. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site structure supports clear navigation. However, the absence of advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features limits its digital maturity. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating minimal data collection. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security configurations and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordicbridgefund.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordicbridgefund.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.