Skip to main content

Security report for noatumlogistics.com

Noatum Logistics · Transportation · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Noatum Logistics operates as a global transport and logistics solutions provider, positioned among the top 50 freight forwarders worldwide. Their services encompass air, ocean, road, and rail freight, along with customs brokerage, warehousing, and value supply chain services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting businesses requiring comprehensive logistics solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and infrastructure appear credible. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noatumlogistics.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the transportation sector, focusing on freight forwarding and logistics services globally. Their business model centers on providing integrated supply chain solutions to corporate clients. The website's content and structured data emphasize their global reach and service diversity. While no direct contact details or privacy policies are evident, the presence of cookie consent and multilingual support indicates compliance efforts. The technology stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting scalability and user engagement. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the content. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap in business credibility, warranting further verification.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates bot protection via reCAPTCHA, alongside a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, formal incident response contacts, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and customer support.
  4. Consider creating a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Noatum Logistics
Description
Noatum Logistics is a leading company in transport and logistics with global coverage, positioned in the Top 50 freight forwarders worldwide
Key services
Air freight, Ocean freight, Road transportation, Train freight, Customs brokerage, Warehousing and distribution, Value supply chain services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft reCAPTCHA, Ultimate VC Addons, Sitepress Multilingual CMS, TablePress, Getsitecontrol
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Getsitecontrol
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Getsitecontrol
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Uses modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with SEO optimization
  3. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly detected in the analyzed content
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. Security headers partially implemented; room for improvement
  8. No visible vulnerability disclosures or security.txt file
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a suite of plugins including Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Cookiebot for cookie management. It uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of modern image formats (WebP). Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noatumlogistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noatumlogistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.