Skip to main content

Security report for nisaliberec.cz

Projekt Nisa, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obchodní centrum Nisa Liberec operates as a regional shopping center in the Czech Republic, offering a wide range of retail shops, dining options, and services including parking and event hosting. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting local shoppers and visitors. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security headers and a security policy page are absent. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and social media presence support business legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and user-friendly digital presence for the shopping center.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nisaliberec.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nisaliberec.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nisaliberec.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a medium-sized retail shopping center serving the Liberec region, with over 130 stores and multiple dining venues. Its business model relies on tenant leasing, event-driven foot traffic, and additional services like gift cards and rentals. The company maintains partnerships with local tourism and event platforms, enhancing its community integration. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on customer experience and engagement, with regular updates on events and promotions. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact via forms or dedicated contact pages. The company appears stable with consistent branding and a clear market niche in retail and hospitality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented to comply with privacy regulations. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries are detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could improve transparency and preparedness. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security measures are adequate for a retail website but could be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide a clear channel for vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Projekt Nisa, s.r.o.
Description
Obchodní centrum Nisa Liberec is a shopping center offering over 130 shops, 14 restaurants and cafes, and 1800 parking spaces. It provides services such as gift cards, center services, a gastro zone, and a rental service called Nisa půjčovna. The website also promotes events and news related to the center.
Key services
Retail shops, Restaurants and cafes, Parking facilities, Event hosting, Gift cards, Rental services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS variables, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookies Giant consent management
Frameworks
Swup (page transitions), Flickity (carousel/slider), Nette Framework (form validation hints)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookies Giant consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and visible.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML.
  8. Modern JavaScript frameworks and consent management tools are used.
  9. Website content is in Czech with multilingual support (English, Polish, German).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including JavaScript frameworks like Swup for page transitions and Flickity for sliders. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior, combined with a comprehensive cookie consent management system by Cookies Giant. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nisaliberec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nisaliberec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.