Skip to main content

Security report for nikon.cz

Nikon · Retail · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nikon.cz is the Czech Republic localized website for Nikon, a globally recognized brand specializing in digital cameras, lenses, and photographic accessories. The site serves as a retail and informational portal targeting photography enthusiasts and professionals within the Czech market. It offers product details, firmware updates, photography competitions, and customer support resources. The website demonstrates consistent branding aligned with Nikon's corporate identity and provides a user-friendly experience with good design and navigation. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React for frontend rendering, OneTrust for cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and implements HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, explicit security headers beyond HTTPS are not clearly visible in the provided data, suggesting room for enhancement in security hardening. From a security and compliance perspective, the site includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements, but lacks visible privacy policy or terms of service links in the analyzed content. No WHOIS data was retrievable, which limits domain registration trust assessment, though the site content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or security incidents were detected in the analysis. Overall, Nikon.cz presents a secure and professional online presence suitable for its business purpose. Strategically, the site could improve transparency by publishing clear privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response information. Enhancing security headers and regularly auditing third-party scripts would further strengthen its security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nikon.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nikon.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nikon.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nikon.cz operates as a regional extension of Nikon Corporation, focusing on retail and informational services for photographic products in the Czech Republic. The business model centers on product sales, firmware updates, and community engagement through competitions. The site targets photography enthusiasts and professionals, leveraging Nikon's strong brand reputation. The presence of multiple localized Nikon domains indicates a broad partnership and subsidiary ecosystem. The use of advanced analytics and consent management tools reflects a mature digital marketing strategy. Growth indicators include active promotion of new products and firmware updates. The absence of explicit contact details and WHOIS data suggests a focus on brand and product rather than direct customer service via the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Use of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights indicates active monitoring and analytics. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the analyzed content suggests potential areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could enhance defenses and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the site.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide publicly available security incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve user trust and support accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nikon
Description
Nikon offers digital cameras, lenses, and photographic accessories.
Key services
Product sales, Firmware updates, Photography competitions, Customer support information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Swiper.js
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with nonce
  • Use of OneTrust for cookie consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product information.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs detected in the snippet.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Website is localized for Czech Republic with multiple language alternates.
  10. Branding and content consistent with Nikon corporate identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. It integrates OneTrust for cookie consent and uses Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and monitoring. The site loads multiple optimized images and uses Swiper.js for carousels. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis but does not impact technical infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nikon.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nikon.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.