Skip to main content

Security report for nh-cap.com

Northern Horizon · Real Estate · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Northern Horizon is a real estate asset management company specializing in healthcare and specialized real estate investments in Northern Europe. The company targets institutional investors by managing real estate funds and separate accounts. The website presents a professional image with clear business focus and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for SEO and privacy compliance respectively. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking and marketing efforts. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, which should be further investigated. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nh-cap.com

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nh-cap.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
1
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-11-13 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nh-cap.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sso.nh-cap.com2025-11-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Northern Horizon operates in the real estate investment sector with a focus on Northern Europe, particularly in healthcare real estate. Its business model revolves around managing funds and accounts for institutional clients, indicating a B2B focus. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience but lacks visible certifications or compliance badges that could strengthen market trust. The LinkedIn presence supports professional networking and brand visibility. The lack of contact details and privacy policies on the website may limit user trust and regulatory compliance. The domain's unclear registration status is a risk factor that could impact business credibility. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Cookiebot introduces potential privacy and security risks if not properly managed. The absence of WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, transparency, and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to improve web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user engagement.
  4. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS registration status to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Establish and publish security and incident response policies, including vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Northern Horizon
Description
Northern Horizon is an experienced real asset manager in Northern Europe. We pursue healthcare and other specialized real estate investment strategies.
Key services
Real estate fund management, Separate account management, Healthcare real estate investment, Specialized real estate investment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, Cookiebot consent management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage or linked content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage content.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and jQuery library.
  7. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a focus on search engine optimization. It uses jQuery as a JavaScript library and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics purposes. The site appears to be mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. The lack of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest technical and operational risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nh-cap.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nh-cap.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.