Skip to main content

Security report for ngventspils.lv

Ventspils draudze "Jaunā paaudze" · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ventspils draudze "Jaunā paaudze" is a small non-profit religious organization based in Ventspils, Latvia, focused on Christian worship, teaching, and community events. The website serves as a communication platform for event announcements, spiritual teachings, and community engagement. It targets the local Christian community and interested individuals seeking religious services and spiritual support. The organization maintains an active presence with regular updates and social media integration, enhancing community outreach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging Jetpack and other modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, and MapKit JS. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a user-friendly experience. Performance is moderate, typical for WordPress.com hosted sites. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and standard security headers likely enforced by WordPress.com and Jetpack. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. There is also no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image appropriate for a small religious non-profit. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the content and technical setup suggest legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ngventspils.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a local religious non-profit serving the Christian community in Ventspils, Latvia. Its business model revolves around community engagement through worship services, seminars, and spiritual support. The website acts as a hub for event information and educational materials, supporting the organization's mission. The presence of international guest speakers and connections to broader religious movements indicates a networked approach to ministry. Revenue streams are likely donation-based or supported by the parent religious movement, though not explicitly stated. The target customers are local church members and interested individuals. Growth indicators include regular event updates and active social media channels. Partnerships with other religious blogs and WordPress.com hosting reflect a collaborative ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture for a small non-profit. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration, and security headers are likely present due to WordPress.com and Jetpack defaults. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms use standard POST methods, and no suspicious scripts were found. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security.txt, or incident response contacts indicates areas for improvement in compliance and transparency. The site would benefit from explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security risk is low but could be improved with better documentation and policy visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance security headers with explicit Content-Security-Policy rules to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ventspils draudze "Jaunā paaudze"
Description
Religious non-profit organization focused on Christian worship, teaching, and community events in Ventspils, Latvia.
Key services
Religious services, Prayer and worship events, Spiritual teaching and seminars, Community support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack plugin, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, MapKit JS
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (Jetpack)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Jetpack, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted religious community site
  2. Content is in Latvian language focused on Christian worship and events
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  6. Use of modern web technologies and social media integration
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing Jetpack and other plugins for enhanced functionality. It uses Google Fonts for typography, Facebook SDK for social media integration, and MapKit JS for map display. The site loads asynchronously scripts to optimize performance. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, typical for managed WordPress hosting. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve privacy and security documentation and to optimize loading times further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ngventspils.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ngventspils.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.