Skip to main content

Security report for nfsa.cz

Nadační fond Škoda Auto · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond Škoda Auto is a non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting the development of the home regions of Škoda Auto, namely Mladoboleslavska, Rychnovska, and Vrchlabska. The foundation provides financial aid, educational programs, and fosters partnerships to enhance community development. It operates grant programs and strategic projects focused on social services, cultural life, and public space revitalization. The website reflects a strong affiliation with Škoda Auto and Volkswagen, indicating a reputable backing. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Vuetify, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics, with a clear cookie consent mechanism in place, demonstrating attention to privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data reduces the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website's content and partner affiliations support its credibility. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its non-profit mission. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, publishing security and incident response policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfsa.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong regional market position as a key non-profit entity supporting Škoda Auto's home regions. Its competitive advantage lies in its direct affiliation with a major automotive company and its comprehensive grant and community programs. The business model focuses on grant funding, strategic partnerships, and educational initiatives targeting local communities and organizations. Growth indicators include active grant programs and multiple partner collaborations. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving public and private sector entities, enhancing the foundation's operational reach and impact.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear adequate with privacy policies and controlled data collection via forms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information by adding verified phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details to resolve WHOIS data gaps and strengthen legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond Škoda Auto
Description
Nadační fond Škoda Auto supports development of home regions Mladoboleslavska, Rychnovska and Vrchlabska, providing financial aid, education, and partnership facilitation.
Key services
Grant programs, Strategic projects, Educational support, Community engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Vuetify, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Vue.js, Vuetify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Strong branding and partnership with Škoda Auto and Volkswagen.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided on the site.
  6. Contact via email and web forms is available.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Modern frontend technologies used (Vue.js, Vuetify).
  9. Google Analytics used with cookie consent.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) combined with Vuetify for UI components, providing a responsive and accessible design. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for user behavior tracking with cookie consent. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Technical risks are minimal but could increase without security header implementation and domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfsa.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfsa.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.