Skip to main content

Security report for nfozp.cz

Nadační fond pro podporu zaměstnávání osob se zdravotním postižení · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond pro podporu zaměstnávání osob se zdravotním postižení (NFOZP) is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting the employment of persons with disabilities. Established in 2007, it operates primarily within the government and non-profit sectors, providing support services, information dissemination, and managing grants to facilitate employment opportunities for disabled individuals. The website serves as an informational and outreach platform targeting employers, persons with disabilities, and related stakeholders in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with standard JavaScript and Google Fonts integrations. It is hosted by a Czech hosting provider with a stable domain registration dating back to 2007, indicating a mature and legitimate online presence. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies, which suggests room for improvement in security posture and compliance. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good accessibility features but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfozp.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
77
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nfozp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nfozp.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NFOZP occupies a niche position as a non-profit foundation focused on disability employment support in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around grant management and support services rather than commercial revenue. The target audience includes employers, disabled persons, government agencies, and non-profit organizations. The foundation's longevity since 2007 suggests stable operations and established partnerships, although no explicit partner domains or subsidiaries are identified. The website's content and structure reflect a focus on information provision rather than transactional services. The absence of marketing or advertising tools aligns with its non-profit status. Strategic opportunities include expanding digital engagement and formalizing compliance and security frameworks to enhance stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and readiness communication. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR, which is critical given the European jurisdiction. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The implementation of an accessibility widget is a positive security and compliance indicator. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy publication, header implementation, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security and abuse contacts.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond pro podporu zaměstnávání osob se zdravotním postižení
Description
Nadační fond pro podporu zaměstnávání osob se zdravotním postižení is a foundation supporting employment of persons with disabilities.
Key services
Support for employment of persons with disabilities, Information dissemination, Grant and fund management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery (custom shim), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
UserWay Accessibility Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme, indicating a standard CMS setup.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Accessibility widget (UserWay) is implemented, indicating some focus on accessibility.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking services detected except accessibility widget.
  8. Website content is in Czech language targeting local audience.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Website appears to be a non-profit foundation supporting employment for disabled persons.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, a widely used and supported platform. It uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and Google Fonts. Hosting is provided by a Czech hosting provider with domain registration dating back to 2007, indicating stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading or technical debt. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by the UserWay accessibility widget. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance mechanisms. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance SEO and privacy compliance frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfozp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfozp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.