Skip to main content

Security report for nfid.one

Internet Identity Labs, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NFID Wallet is a technology company specializing in a decentralized, self-sovereign cryptocurrency wallet tailored for the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) ecosystem. The wallet emphasizes ease of use, security, and governance by a DAO, positioning itself as a leading ICP wallet with unique features such as no seed phrase recovery and transaction review mechanisms. The company operates primarily in the US and was founded in 2021, aligning with the domain registration date. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, targeting crypto users and Web3 enthusiasts seeking secure and user-friendly ICP wallet solutions. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React and integrates with Google Identity Services and various ICP-related APIs. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS, strict Content Security Policy, and an all-green third-party audit report publicly available. However, the site lacks a cookie consent mechanism and explicit security or incident response contact information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, NFID Wallet presents a credible, secure, and technically mature platform with a clear market position in the ICP wallet space.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfid.one

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NFID Wallet operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on wallet services for the ICP network. Its competitive advantage lies in DAO governance, open-source transparency, and comprehensive security audits. The business model centers on providing decentralized wallet services with token swapping, portfolio management, and dapp connectivity, rewarding stakeholders with governance tokens. The target customers are ICP users and crypto investors valuing security and ease of use. The company maintains an active presence on major social media and developer platforms, fostering community engagement. Partnerships with identitykit.xyz and Internet Identity Labs enhance its ecosystem integration. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, audit transparency, and a growing user base. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and incident response transparency to strengthen trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, a robust Content Security Policy restricting scripts and resources, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The wallet itself is open-source and third-party audited with an all-green report, indicating strong internal security controls. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts on the website represent minor gaps. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is evident, which could improve transparency and responsiveness. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and terms hosted externally but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalized incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures.
  4. Publish contact information for security incidents, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Identity Labs, Inc.
Description
The easiest to use, hardest to lose, and only wallet governed by a DAO. Secure your assets with the most audited wallet on ICP and start exploring ICP applications in seconds. Trusted by hundreds of thousands worldwide.
Key services
Token swapping at best prices, Secure token sending and receiving, ICP portfolio management with NFT tracking, Connection to ICP ecosystem dapps, Transaction review and approval
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Google Identity Services, Toastify
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Internet Computer Protocol (ICP)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy with strict directives
  • No object-src allowed
  • Script-src with nonce and hash
  • No inline scripts except allowed unsafe-eval and hashes
  • No DNSSEC enabled (not ideal but domain status protected)
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (stats.g.doubleclick.net)
Marketing tools
Google Identity Services
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on security and user experience
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  4. Privacy and terms policies hosted on related domain identitykit.xyz
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. No explicit security or incident response contact information
  7. Use of modern web technologies and strict CSP
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, GitHub, Discord, LinkedIn, Open Chat
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with modern JavaScript practices, integrating Google Identity Services for authentication and various ICP ecosystem APIs for functionality. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, ensuring performance and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with deferred scripts and optimized assets. The domain is registered via Squarespace with privacy protection, consistent with a startup profile. Technical risks are minimal, though enabling DNSSEC and improving privacy compliance would reduce potential attack vectors and regulatory risks. The site architecture supports scalability and integration with ICP dapps, positioning it well for future growth.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfid.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfid.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.