Skip to main content

Security report for nfflaminia.cz

Nadační fond Flaminia · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond Flaminia is a Czech non-profit foundation established in 2007, dedicated to supporting mental health and psychological wellbeing projects for children and youth. The organization collaborates with various partner projects and runs awareness campaigns to promote mental health care as equally important as physical health. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, providing clear contact information and detailed descriptions of their initiatives and supported projects. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site is accessible and well-structured, though it uses multiple versions of Bootstrap and jQuery which could be streamlined. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks important security headers and privacy/cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. No WHOIS data was found for the domain, which reduces trustworthiness and raises questions about domain registration legitimacy. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional in content and presentation but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security hardening. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable concern that should be investigated further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nfflaminia.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector focused on mental health for children and youth in the Czech Republic. It has a clear market position as a supporter and promoter of mental health projects, collaborating with multiple partner organizations. Their business model relies on donations and partnerships to fund and run projects. The target audience includes children, youth, parents, educators, and healthcare professionals. The organization demonstrates growth and engagement through campaigns and events. The partnership ecosystem is strong with several aligned non-profit projects. The website content and structure support credibility and transparency, including annual reports and contact details.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust. No vulnerable libraries or known security issues were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  5. Consolidate and update third-party libraries (Bootstrap, jQuery) to latest stable versions to reduce technical debt and potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadační fond Flaminia
Registration number
28212185
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond Flaminia
Description
Nadační fond Flaminia podporuje projekty zaměřené na duševní zdraví a psychickou pohodu dětí a mladistvých.
Key services
Support of mental health projects, Educational programs, Funding and promotion of partner initiatives, Public awareness campaigns
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha1, jQuery 3.3.1 slim, jQuery 3.6.3, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Comfortaa), Elfsight widgets
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of defer attribute on scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elfsight widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  5. Website uses multiple versions of Bootstrap and jQuery, which may cause technical debt.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Content is professionally presented and targeted at mental health support for youth.
  9. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap 4.3.1 and 5.3.0-alpha1, along with jQuery versions 3.3.1 slim and 3.6.3, which indicates some technical debt and potential conflicts. FontAwesome and Google Fonts are used for UI and typography. Elfsight widgets provide social media integration. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple libraries and external resources. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and cleanup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nfflaminia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nfflaminia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.