Skip to main content

Security report for next-ma.eu

GetResponse · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GetResponse MAX is an online marketing platform focused on providing integrated tools for email marketing, autoresponders, newsletter hosting, landing pages, and campaign automation. The platform targets businesses and marketers seeking a comprehensive SaaS solution to manage their marketing efforts efficiently. The website analyzed is a login page for the platform, featuring modern React-based frontend technologies and served via a reputable CDN infrastructure. The technical infrastructure demonstrates a mature digital presence with multiple microfrontends and use of advanced JavaScript frameworks. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented; however, the absence of visible security headers and privacy policies on this page indicates room for improvement in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but lacks some compliance documentation and contact information on this specific page, which may impact user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching next-ma.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention next-ma.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for next-ma.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GetResponse operates in the competitive email marketing and marketing automation sector, offering a SaaS subscription model. Its market position is established with a broad suite of marketing tools aimed at businesses of various sizes. The platform's business model relies on recurring revenue from subscriptions, targeting marketers who require integrated marketing solutions. The company leverages a global CDN and modern frontend technologies to deliver a responsive user experience. While the login page analyzed is minimalistic, it aligns with industry standards for secure access points. The lack of visible contact or policy information on this page suggests that such details may be hosted elsewhere on the main site. The company’s partnership ecosystem and subsidiary domains were not identified from this page, indicating a focused brand presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies on this page, which is a compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The security score is moderate to high, but improvements in header implementation and policy transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from all pages including login.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide visible contact information or links to support and security incident response contacts.
  4. Include a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GetResponse
Description
Online marketing platform providing tools for email marketing, autoresponders, newsletter hosting, email deliverability, landing pages, and campaign automation.
Key services
Email marketing, Autoresponders, Newsletter hosting, Landing pages, Campaign automation
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (multiple versions including 16,17,18,19), SystemJS, CloudFront CDN, Sentry (error tracking), Moment.js, Styled-components
Frameworks
React
Platforms
AWS CloudFront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry (error tracking)
Marketing tools
GetResponse marketing platform tools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for GetResponse MAX marketing platform
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies on this page
  3. No contact information or forms present on this login page
  4. Uses modern React-based frontend with multiple microfrontends
  5. Content is minimal as expected for a login page
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. Security best practices partially implemented but security headers missing
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based microfrontend architecture served via AWS CloudFront CDN, indicating a scalable and modular infrastructure. Multiple React versions are loaded, which may suggest legacy support or phased upgrades. The site uses SystemJS for module loading and includes libraries such as Moment.js and styled-components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks visible CMS indicators, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting is linked to OVH SAS as registrar and AWS CloudFront for content delivery. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with next-ma.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review next-ma.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.