Skip to main content

Security report for newlivingcenter.cz

New Living Center · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

New Living Center is a Prague-based design and housing center catering to architects, designers, developers, and design enthusiasts. It offers a comprehensive range of showroom services and design brands across a large physical space, positioning itself as a key player in the Czech real estate and retail design market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and SmartEmailing for marketing and analytics, with mobile optimization and SEO considerations in place. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement. Overall, the site is legitimate and operational, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding security headers, and publishing incident response information to strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of newlivingcenter.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching newlivingcenter.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate and retail sectors, focusing on interior design and housing solutions. It targets professional and consumer segments interested in design and home improvement. The business model revolves around showroom sales, design services, and commercial space rental. The presence of multiple showroom brands and a newsletter indicates diversified revenue streams and customer engagement strategies. The company maintains partnerships with design firms and marketing service providers, enhancing its market presence. Growth potential is supported by a strong digital presence and active social media channels. However, the lack of publicly available corporate registration details limits full business transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA in forms to prevent spam. Tracking and marketing scripts are present but no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
New Living Center
Description
Centrum bydlení a designu v Praze, zaměřené na architekty, designéry, developery a zákazníky milující design. Nabízí více než 15 showroomů a 81 designových značek na ploše přes 7.000 m² v 5 patrech. Poskytuje komplexní řešení od stavby po interiérový design.
Key services
showroomy s designovými produkty, komplexní řešení interiérů, pronájem komerčních prostor, newsletter s inspiracemi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Flickity carousel, SmartEmailing web forms, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA site key in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Seznam Retargeting
Marketing tools
SmartEmailing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or domain registry issues
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main pages
  4. Contact information primarily via contact form and social media links
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. Good design and user experience with mobile optimization
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  9. No certifications or security policies published
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Flickity carousel for UI, and SmartEmailing for newsletter forms. It loads Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads critical assets for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policies, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with newlivingcenter.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review newlivingcenter.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.