Skip to main content

Security report for netx.de

NETX business experts · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NETX business experts is a German IT consulting company specializing in information security, data protection, project management, and IT architecture. The company targets business professionals and organizations seeking expert services in these domains. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, with common plugins for SEO and cookie management. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosures. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the domain age and content are consistent, supporting legitimacy. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and improving accessibility and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netx.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention netx.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for netx.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NETX operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT security and consulting services. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises requiring compliance and IT architecture expertise. The website indicates a small-sized company founded around 2013, with no parent or subsidiary companies listed. The company maintains a professional web presence with clear contact channels but lacks social media engagement and detailed legal documentation. The external linked domains suggest internal service portals (servicedesk and documentation) but no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The company could benefit from expanding its digital footprint and transparency to strengthen market position and trust.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the lack of a privacy policy is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response contact channels are not provided, which could delay handling security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could be significantly improved with documented policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with standards.
  5. Expand contact options to include dedicated security or abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NETX business experts
Description
Informationssicherheit * Datenschutz * Projektmanagement * IT-Architektur
Key services
Informationssicherheit, Datenschutz, Projektmanagement, IT-Architektur
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Enfold Theme, All in One SEO, Cookie Law Info plugin, WP Statistics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site focused on IT security and consulting.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR relevant.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found on main site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  7. Site uses WordPress with Enfold theme and common plugins.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Site content is in German language.
  10. Registration for new users is disabled on the signup page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Enfold theme and standard plugins for SEO and cookie management. The tech stack includes jQuery and PHP, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided data. Performance is moderate with some inline styles and scripts optimized for above-the-fold content. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Hosting provider details are not explicit, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netx.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netx.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.